Good place to be. Good people
Good place to be. Good people
Great office environment, complete with a pool and table tennis table.
Lunch is catered twice a week.
Employee share program.
Generous salary.
Great people.
If you don't work in the right office, it can be harder to have your opinion heard.
Additional Ratings
Was this helpful?
The Trade Desk Interview Questions
The Trade Desk Interview Experiences
Software Engineer
I got four rounds of interviews: * Online code challenge * Phone interview with HR * Onsite interview * Take-home project I failed to pass the rest. I'm not so sure how many rounds there were in total.
Senior Software Engineer
The overall interview experience was positive, and the interviewers were friendly, professional, and engaging throughout the process. The interview structure was well-designed, consisting of 5-6 rounds over several weeks, which allowed for a thorough
Principal Software Engineer
Interview was smooth. First contact with an agent. First online coding with two developers. After that, two system design interviews and two coding sessions. The last one was on a whiteboard. After that, a follow-up about the result was made two time
Software Engineer
Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaOctober 1, 2019I got four rounds of interviews: * Online code challenge * Phone interview with HR * Onsite interview * Take-home project I failed to pass the rest. I'm not so sure how many rounds there were in total.
Senior Software Engineer
Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaApril 1, 2025The overall interview experience was positive, and the interviewers were friendly, professional, and engaging throughout the process. The interview structure was well-designed, consisting of 5-6 rounds over several weeks, which allowed for a thorough
Principal Software Engineer
Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaApril 1, 2024Interview was smooth. First contact with an agent. First online coding with two developers. After that, two system design interviews and two coding sessions. The last one was on a whiteboard. After that, a follow-up about the result was made two time
