Easy, pays fine, some nice people. Actually, a really good product. You can work 3 hours a day and outperform your peers if you are good. The business will be successful too. It's pretty chill and has cool tech.
Bloat, bad technical leadership in some areas, and an over-focus on planning at the expense of execution. Boring AF.
Just send it. What's the problem, son? Let's GOOO!
The interview process involved an initial screening call, a remote coding assessment, and then an onsite day with various in-person interviews. The in-person interviews included: * A pair programming challenge * Two architecture challenges * Meetin
Without going into specifics due to an NDA contract, I will try to be as specific as possible to provide some useful feedback. I was interviewing for a senior engineer position (staff in their org chart). Good experience overall. The work environmen
The interview process was pretty standard for a technical company. It included a coding phone screen and an onsite, with about 4 rounds. The process took about 1-2 weeks. Round 1: Telephonic + Hackerrank. Onsite rounds included: * Behavioral * Lun
The interview process involved an initial screening call, a remote coding assessment, and then an onsite day with various in-person interviews. The in-person interviews included: * A pair programming challenge * Two architecture challenges * Meetin
Without going into specifics due to an NDA contract, I will try to be as specific as possible to provide some useful feedback. I was interviewing for a senior engineer position (staff in their org chart). Good experience overall. The work environmen
The interview process was pretty standard for a technical company. It included a coding phone screen and an onsite, with about 4 rounds. The process took about 1-2 weeks. Round 1: Telephonic + Hackerrank. Onsite rounds included: * Behavioral * Lun