Pros: There are still great people on some teams, but you have to find them, and team experience varies a lot (true for most companies). Compensation is okay. Work/life balance is great. The office is incredible. Twitch has committed and passionate users, which can make you feel good about launching features for them.

Cons: - Not much alignment on any common goals, and it's hard to work with other teams. Teams re-implement features that already exist just so they can do it themselves. - Management is mainly a mix of career Amazon people and hopelessly inexperienced new hires trying to stay afloat. - Zero high-level engineering direction. Internal dev tooling is terrible compared to similar-sized companies. - Zero diversity. 3 women on a team of 60.

Pros: Our biggest problem (at least on our team) is that we have a vision to build systems and tech much larger than today's, and the problem set is hard. It's rare to get to work on technical problems like this as a day job. Amazon honestly is very lenient on us. We get to choose our tech stacks, tools, methodologies, etc. Their approach is not a top-down one where you are told which CI system or tool to use. There are teams building support systems, and as an engineer, you literally own your destiny and pick the best tools for the job. The amount of freedom we have in terms of proposing projects that actually happen is really good. We have practically no restrictions on equipment and tech resource availability. The amount of freedom to pick and use open-source or AWS resources is really, really good. As someone who worked in the past at places penny-pinching, or where asking for compute resources were months-long requests to finance, this availability makes me super happy. The company does listen to feedback and take it seriously. Management actually cares about people and gives priority to this. There has been a lot of movement lately to actually address pain points brought up.

Cons: - Office coffee leaves much to be desired. - Late 2016/2017 were rough. We suddenly got a ton of external competition from heavy hitters (YouTube, Facebook). The company went gung-ho on features and catch-up, which was hard but necessary. We are in a much better spot today, but it was hard on people. - Twitch had a mix of legacy systems from the Justin.tv days, along with the newer ones. Literally, the whole company spent a large amount of time last year working on the very unsexy problem of cleaning debt. This was also hard on everyone, but we got rid, for the most part, of massive chunks of tech debt. - Some parts of Twitch do suffer from "not-invented-here" syndrome. We could leverage more external and Amazon's tools, which will free up time to work on other larger technical challenges.

Pros: Great tech stack, really easy to get working. Cool office. Great food. Cookies. Lots to build and learn at the L4-L5 and even L6 level.

Cons: Always scrambling to "make profit" over building things the users want. From the ground level, it looks like the CEO isn't really doing much other than streaming (and maybe trying to figure out what Twitch is about). Lots of layers of middle management for a company that hasn't really changed since 2016. The app is small, with like, 5 things on it, yet, working across org boundaries feels like a geopolitical feat. Product, Eng, Design, and Research all work in their own silos with no one to provide guidance. Everyone has a say, which means nothing gets done.