Pros: The Human Resources department has been doing a great job at posting fake 5-star reviews on Glassdoor, all to convince the founding partners and the outside world that everything is just peachy.

Cons: Compensation is low compared to peers. There are no real growth opportunities. If you want to learn something new, then forget about this place and move on. The technology is arcane, bloated, poorly managed, and plain old. You will be told lies at the interview about the so-called state-of-the-art internal technology stack. There's no real innovation either, only pretend business-unrelated ideas which never fully materialize. Many promising projects silently fail. Most VPs and MDs are pretty bad at their job, although they are very good at blaming each other for failures, taking credit for each other's accidental achievements, exaggerating their own results, and convincing the upper management that they're worth the unreasonably high compensation. Partners have no idea what's going on and why things aren't working anymore, but they keep on introducing and removing dubious workflow/HR procedures, restructuring the company every 6 months, moving people around, reassigning responsibilities, and hiring external CTOs. Don't waste your time there!

Pros: - Excellent culture that pushes being kind to one another. - Tons of talented and interesting people. - Good perks (office gym, frequent free food, very flexible remote work policy).

Cons: - Compensation could always be better, and there's relatively little transparency around this. - Development infrastructure is weighed down by legacy systems, but improvements are being made. - The promotion process (packet writing + committee review) is a bit of a hassle.

Pros: Hybrid work, good pay, smart culture.

Cons: A bit of controversy in the news and lack of transparency from leaders.