I had a single, comprehensive interview round that covered multiple areas including problem solving, basic Python questions, one medium-level DSA question (LeetCode style), an ML coding question, ML fundamentals, research-based questions, and a detailed technical discussion. The interview itself went well from my side, and I was informed the same day that I had been selected. The process up to that point felt structured and technically thorough.

After selection, I was asked to submit all required documents such as bank statements and payslips. During the compensation discussion, I mentioned that I currently hold a work-from-home offer. Since this role required relocation to Bangalore, I requested consideration for the difference in living costs. In response, I was asked why I wanted to work from Bangalore and was told I could choose a more cost-effective location. This felt dismissive, especially given that relocation requirements and cost differences are legitimate discussion points during negotiation. I then shared my expected compensation figure and was told I would receive an update.

After a week without any communication, my attempts to follow up were either ignored or left unanswered. Eventually, when I was able to connect with one of the HR representatives, I was informed that my expected figure had been rejected and that they would not be proceeding further. While the technical interview experience was positive, the post-selection communication and negotiation handling felt unprofessional and lacked transparency. A more structured and respectful communication process would have made the experience significantly better.

The topics included a Product of Array Except Self Python implementation, a PyTorch implementation of training and evaluation, RAG-based specific questions, past research-based questions, and basic Python concepts.