Pros: Lots of smart technical people to learn from. Funded and possible IPO.

Cons: Overall: Separating from Google culture. In devices org: * Poor strategy: e.g., repeated over-excitement followed by cancellation of projects. * Culture: overvaluation of politicians, undervaluation of technical folks. * Understaffing. * Attrition: departure of a lot of best talent.

Pros: Excellent Teammates (smart + helpful). Great Compensation + benefits.

Cons: Product Roadmap: Good, not Great. Company spread too thin (management issue). Could have better transparency between upper and lower management.

Pros: Used to be more like Google. Andy used to be more forthcoming. Some teams are shielded better than others.

Cons: Verily’s projects are consistently understaffed, and stress levels reflect that. Verily calls itself a startup when it suits them (minimal resources, cutting benefits, work/life balance problems) and plays up the message that they come from Google when it suits them (any external messaging). Requests for transparency from leadership are met with answers that downplay the issues or outright say that there are no problems. Dissatisfaction and attrition from rank-and-file employees. The new COO seems like a good change, but it may be too little too late after years of C-levels telling us that the problems we see and experience daily don’t actually exist. Executives and middle managers focus on denouncing leakers while ignoring the underlying problems within the company. Would not recommend as a place to work for those concerned with DEI. Too much reliance on promoting “the mission.” The mission should be used to motivate people, not be used as justification to guilt people when they question cost-cutting. Promotions are very political.