For context, I was put on a specific project that I really liked working with engineers at my level and age range. I was moved onto a different project within a month of my onboarding, which was disappointing. I didn't mind the work, but it's pretty clear that the organization was poor, as engineers were harried to meet deadlines.
I was very concerned when they pulled me and the offshore team for a major production release, where the stakeholder said nothing may go wrong, given the stakes.
I didn't dislike my time there; I actually rather liked the people. But the work wasn't what I was promised, and my year-long contract to hire ended earlier than expected. I was told by my employers that it had nothing to do with my work performance, and that the terms of the contract changed with the client (Wells Fargo).
I suppose the change coincided with changes in upper leadership, so that could explain the situation.
Bit disappointing, but the pay was great, and I rather liked my team.
It's not a great idea to interview an engineer for one project and then move them to a project they didn't expect or want next month. That's kind of a bait and switch, even if it was unintentional.
I got the interview through by applying on LinkedIn. The first round was a one-hour technical round with questions on Java, real-time scenarios, and DSA. The second round was a face-to-face, in-person technical interview.
Interviewed by two people, and one of them seemed to only be interested in finding flaws. He scribbled notes and seemed animated only when I felt he didn't like my answer. For some reason, he didn't like my answer to conflict resolution, which was a
First, a pre-screen call with the recruiter. Next, a 1-hour interview with a few seniors and a VP. About a month after the interview, I was told I was declined. They asked a number of technical questions.
I got the interview through by applying on LinkedIn. The first round was a one-hour technical round with questions on Java, real-time scenarios, and DSA. The second round was a face-to-face, in-person technical interview.
Interviewed by two people, and one of them seemed to only be interested in finding flaws. He scribbled notes and seemed animated only when I felt he didn't like my answer. For some reason, he didn't like my answer to conflict resolution, which was a
First, a pre-screen call with the recruiter. Next, a 1-hour interview with a few seniors and a VP. About a month after the interview, I was told I was declined. They asked a number of technical questions.