People are smart around you. Engineering is good. Problems are worth tackling.
Unusually high expectations and not that good pay to match it. Extremely feedback-driven; do one single mistake and someone will write it on your feedback. I feel it depends on who your lead is and the kind of team it is. For me, it has become quite suffocating to receive so much feedback, especially when two team members can give opposite feedback.
You guys have amazing vision, but there's a possibility of feedback suffocation for employees. I feel you should tackle this.
1. The initial round was a standard HR session. 2. Technical round with engineers from the project. The whole session was focusing on coding. The task was about creating a solution for currency changing.
Screening HR call, pair programming interview with 1/2 engineers. I didn’t get past the pair programming as they said my knowledge of caching wasn’t up to the standard they’d hoped for.
Spoke with an internal recruiter, then had a code pairing interview with an engineer. The interview with the recruiter was straightforward enough and more just to touch base on the company.
1. The initial round was a standard HR session. 2. Technical round with engineers from the project. The whole session was focusing on coding. The task was about creating a solution for currency changing.
Screening HR call, pair programming interview with 1/2 engineers. I didn’t get past the pair programming as they said my knowledge of caching wasn’t up to the standard they’d hoped for.
Spoke with an internal recruiter, then had a code pairing interview with an engineer. The interview with the recruiter was straightforward enough and more just to touch base on the company.