The product is cool. The company is profitable and growing.
Hybrid work: You can go into the office as many times as you want, from 0 to 5 days a week. You're completely free.
Salaries are falling behind, and the company refuses to address this problem. Instead, management tries to sell a story along the lines of "Aren't you lucky you have a job? Other companies are firing people." It's only a matter of time before this is reflected in the quality of our hires and, therefore, the product. No money equals no talent.
The "benefits" are overplayed. We have average lunches once a week. Pension contributions are a meager 5%, just above the legal minimum.
Employees are not appreciated or recognized. Instead of actual help (£££), we get the classic startup package of mental well-being training and so on.
Autonomous teams don't work; they only create technical debt.
Knowing people goes a long way because the company has no structure.
All the problems I described have been known to management for years; they just lack the will to fix them. They think things are fine as they are.
First, a technical assessment on Hackerrank, low difficulty. Then, a pre-recorded video interview for multiple questions, and some knowledge questionnaires with general information questions, although some questions are about specific names of techn
Had an initial call with the recruiter where we went through my experience and what I was looking for. Nothing new there. Next, there were three more interviews. Two of them were on the same day at their office in London: one with two engineers and
Screening round with a recruiter, followed by a tech test with a senior engineer or two. The recruiter round is a straightforward screening, as standard. The tech test tends to be a practical problem based on a real-life scenario relevant to Wise, no
First, a technical assessment on Hackerrank, low difficulty. Then, a pre-recorded video interview for multiple questions, and some knowledge questionnaires with general information questions, although some questions are about specific names of techn
Had an initial call with the recruiter where we went through my experience and what I was looking for. Nothing new there. Next, there were three more interviews. Two of them were on the same day at their office in London: one with two engineers and
Screening round with a recruiter, followed by a tech test with a senior engineer or two. The recruiter round is a straightforward screening, as standard. The tech test tends to be a practical problem based on a real-life scenario relevant to Wise, no