It was a great company, pre-IPO and for a couple of years after that.
The culture is going down the drain with new management in Tools. Apps is still alright.
Apps have a different issue with proprietary technology.
You have to know how to suck up to upper management (read: long-timers) to get ahead, or else you are stuck or ignored.
Senior management is afraid to talk to executive management about issues, as it might be taken in the wrong way. Just drink the Kool-Aid, and all will be fine.
A "yes, sir" attitude gets you promoted pretty quickly.
So-called Sr. Principal Engineers are there because they know they can't find a job elsewhere with their skillset and attitude. The smart ones have jumped ship.
The CEO should wake up to see the reality in Engineering. Just because products are selling great doesn't mean all is well. There is a reason why most of the senior (smart) engineers are leaving. Bring back previous management.
HR can improve their act. We are market leaders in the HCM space!
The Customer Support department needs to be revamped. Half of the support analysts don't know what they are doing. They just shiver when the top manager is on every case (literally).
Certainly miss Dave's openness and frank conversations.
Create a genuine feedback loop – not just namesake – and be ready to hear honest, critical opinions. Employees are your friends!
The interviewer was not very engaging or helpful with the candidate. The candidate was given the technical question, and the interviewer seemed bored the entire time, even when the candidate asked questions and clarified their understanding of the so
A Negative Experience I had a call with a recruiter, followed by a call with the hiring manager, and then three subsequent interviews. All of these interactions seemed well-organized. After the final interview—the fifth interaction, involving discu
The interview process began with a general screen, followed by a coding challenge over the phone, and concluded with an onsite interview. At the onsite, I had meetings with several managers, participated in an architectural discussion, and completed
The interviewer was not very engaging or helpful with the candidate. The candidate was given the technical question, and the interviewer seemed bored the entire time, even when the candidate asked questions and clarified their understanding of the so
A Negative Experience I had a call with a recruiter, followed by a call with the hiring manager, and then three subsequent interviews. All of these interactions seemed well-organized. After the final interview—the fifth interaction, involving discu
The interview process began with a general screen, followed by a coding challenge over the phone, and concluded with an onsite interview. At the onsite, I had meetings with several managers, participated in an architectural discussion, and completed