You get to work on the most trafficked websites on the internet. The company uses and contributes to many open-source projects, which allows you to learn and become an expert on them. You get to work with some interesting and fun people. The company is not just about building portal websites; there are many interesting and challenging projects, mostly involving scaling of some sort. Some groups are practical and allow for innovation from within. The company encourages internal hacks, sponsoring hack day events both internally and externally.
Poor management decision-making.
Always wanting to play catch-up, rather than innovate.
Old-timers tend to be undervalued and under-compensated.
Upper management tends to bring in external hires rather than promote from within.
Performance follows the 80-20 rule, i.e., most projects are heavily dependent on 20% of the staff.
Yet, management tends to split bonuses across the entire team rather than reward the top 20% more.
Reward your top performers and let them lead.
Learn to listen within, else you'll start losing them.
The recruiter, or sometimes the engineering manager, will contact you and schedule the interview. The interviewers sometimes have an interview and don't realize their feedback is considered. Yahoo hiring has so much politics. It's not the same comp
Waste of time. 4-hour work sample plus 6 hours of interviews. No discussion of the work sample or feedback on it was provided. The technical interviewers were not friendly or collaborative and spoke poor English.
One telephonic screening round with an engineer. Followed by one discussion with the manager about the role and the project in detail. This was followed by four remote phone interviews purely on frontend modules.
The recruiter, or sometimes the engineering manager, will contact you and schedule the interview. The interviewers sometimes have an interview and don't realize their feedback is considered. Yahoo hiring has so much politics. It's not the same comp
Waste of time. 4-hour work sample plus 6 hours of interviews. No discussion of the work sample or feedback on it was provided. The technical interviewers were not friendly or collaborative and spoke poor English.
One telephonic screening round with an engineer. Followed by one discussion with the manager about the role and the project in detail. This was followed by four remote phone interviews purely on frontend modules.