Good good good good
Nothing, nothing, nothing.
The interview was purely algorithmic. The interviewee knew them worse than I did. It's really strange that the company puts people like that to interview interns. I really suggest going straight for a junior job and not getting stuck as an intern.
The interview was more about checking the candidate's soft skills. Simultaneously, common questions such as: * "From which character cannot start a variable name in Python?" * "What is 'dict' in Python? Describe more about hashtable working logi
They gave a code task, with 2-3 subtasks for more points. They allowed 60 minutes for this. Then they presented 2 algorithm tasks, with medium/hard difficulty and 60 minutes allocated as well.
The interview was purely algorithmic. The interviewee knew them worse than I did. It's really strange that the company puts people like that to interview interns. I really suggest going straight for a junior job and not getting stuck as an intern.
The interview was more about checking the candidate's soft skills. Simultaneously, common questions such as: * "From which character cannot start a variable name in Python?" * "What is 'dict' in Python? Describe more about hashtable working logi
They gave a code task, with 2-3 subtasks for more points. They allowed 60 minutes for this. Then they presented 2 algorithm tasks, with medium/hard difficulty and 60 minutes allocated as well.