You are given a string command
that represents instructions for a Goal Parser. The command
string consists of the characters 'G', '()', and '(al)' in some order. The Goal Parser interprets these as follows:
The interpreted strings are then concatenated in the original order to form the final result.
Your task is to implement a function that takes the command
string as input and returns the Goal Parser's interpretation of the command.
Example 1:
Input: command = "G()(al)"
Output: "Goal"
Explanation: G -> G, () -> o, (al) -> al. Concatenating gives "Goal".
Example 2:
Input: command = "G()()()()(al)"
Output: "Gooooal"
Example 3:
Input: command = "(al)G(al)()()G"
Output: "alGalooG"
Constraints:
1 <= command.length <= 100
command
consists only of 'G', '()', and '(al)'.Here's an analysis of the Goal Parser problem and a solution:
A straightforward approach is to iterate through the input string command
and check for the specific patterns "G", "()", and "(al)". When one of these patterns is found, append the corresponding interpretation to the result string.
Code (Python):
def interpret_naive(command: str) -> str:
result = ""
i = 0
while i < len(command):
if command[i] == 'G':
result += 'G'
i += 1
elif command[i:i+2] == '()':
result += 'o'
i += 2
elif command[i:i+4] == '(al)':
result += 'al'
i += 4
else:
i += 1 # Handle unexpected characters (optional)
return result
The optimal solution also involves iterating through the string, but uses string replacement methods for efficiency.
Code (Python):
def interpret_optimal(command: str) -> str:
command = command.replace('()', 'o')
command = command.replace('(al)', 'al')
return command
command
. Both the naive and optimal solutions iterate through the string once.else
condition included) would skip over them, while the optimal solution could produce unexpected results. The problem statement does not specify how to handle invalid input, so we assume it will not occur.The optimal solution using string replacement is generally more concise and efficient than the naive iterative approach, though both have the same time complexity in Big O notation. The choice depends on the specific requirements of the context in which the code is used.