You are given an array of integers nums
(0-indexed) and an integer k
. The score of a subarray (i, j)
is defined as min(nums[i], nums[i+1], ..., nums[j]) * (j - i + 1)
. A good subarray is a subarray where i <= k <= j
. Return the maximum possible score of a good subarray.
For example:
nums = [1,4,3,7,4,5], k = 3
. The optimal subarray is (1, 5)
with a score of min(4,3,7,4,5) * (5-1+1) = 3 * 5 = 15
.nums = [5,5,4,5,4,1,1,1], k = 0
. The optimal subarray is (0, 4)
with a score of min(5,5,4,5,4) * (4-0+1) = 4 * 5 = 20
.Could you provide a solution to find the maximum possible score of a good subarray?
When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force approach to finding the maximum score of a good subarray involves checking every possible subarray. We consider each possible starting point and ending point within the given numbers. We then validate if this subarray is considered 'good' and calculate the score.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def maximum_score_of_good_subarray_brute_force(numbers, lower_bound):
maximum_score = 0
# Iterate through all possible starting points
for start_index in range(len(numbers)):
# Iterate through all possible ending points for each starting point
for end_index in range(start_index, len(numbers)):
current_subarray = numbers[start_index:end_index + 1]
# Check if the subarray is a 'good' subarray
is_good = all(number >= lower_bound for number in current_subarray)
if is_good:
# Calculate score only if subarray is 'good'
current_score = sum(current_subarray)
# Update maximum score if necessary
maximum_score = max(maximum_score, current_score)
return maximum_score
The key to maximizing the score is to expand outwards from the given starting point. We maintain the best possible score as we expand, making sure the subarray we're looking at is always 'good'.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def maximum_score_of_a_good_subarray(numbers, starting_index):
highest_score = numbers[starting_index]
left_index = starting_index
right_index = starting_index
minimum_value = numbers[starting_index]
while left_index > 0 or right_index < len(numbers) - 1:
# Expand in the direction with the larger value
if left_index == 0:
right_index += 1
elif right_index == len(numbers) - 1:
left_index -= 1
elif numbers[left_index - 1] < numbers[right_index + 1]:
right_index += 1
else:
left_index -= 1
# Maintain the smallest value in the current good subarray
minimum_value = min(minimum_value, numbers[left_index], numbers[right_index])
# Calculate the score of the current good subarray
current_score = minimum_value * (right_index - left_index + 1)
# Update the highest score if necessary
highest_score = max(highest_score, current_score)
return highest_score
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Empty nums array | Return 0, as there are no subarrays to consider. |
nums array with one element | Return the single element's value as the maximum score with k=0. |
k is at the beginning or end of the array | Ensure the sliding window expands correctly from these boundary indices. |
All elements in nums are the same | The minimum value will be that element, so the problem reduces to finding the largest subarray containing 'k'. |
All elements in nums are very large positive numbers causing potential integer overflow | Use a larger data type like long to store the product and sum to avoid overflow. |
nums contains negative numbers and zeros | Handle zero values correctly in calculating the minimum value and ensure the multiplication does not result in unintended negative minimums. |
k is in the middle of a monotonically increasing or decreasing sequence | The window will always expand at least to include k, properly handling the monotonic nature of sequences. |
Large array size with k near the beginning of the array | The while loops should still terminate correctly, as the condition depends on i >= 0 and j < n not array size. |