You are given two 0-indexed integer arrays servers
and tasks
of lengths n
and m
respectively. servers[i]
is the weight of the i<sup>th</sup>
server, and tasks[j]
is the time needed to process the j<sup>th</sup>
task in seconds. Tasks are assigned to servers using a task queue.
Initially, all servers are free, and the queue is empty.
At second j
, the j<sup>th</sup>
task is inserted into the queue. As long as there are free servers and the queue is not empty, the task in the front of the queue will be assigned to a free server with the smallest weight, and in case of a tie, it is assigned to a free server with the smallest index.
If there are no free servers and the queue is not empty, we wait until a server becomes free and immediately assign the next task. If multiple servers become free at the same time, then multiple tasks from the queue will be assigned in order of insertion following the weight and index priorities above. A server that is assigned task j
at second t
will be free again at second t + tasks[j]
.
Your goal is to build an array ans
of length m
, where ans[j]
is the index of the server the j<sup>th</sup>
task will be assigned to.
Return the array ans
.
Here are two examples to illustrate the process:
Example 1:
Input: servers = [3,3,2], tasks = [1,2,3,2,1,2]
Output: [2,2,0,2,1,2]
Example 2:
Input: servers = [5,1,4,3,2], tasks = [2,1,2,4,5,2,1]
Output: [1,4,1,4,1,3,2]
Can you write an algorithm to efficiently solve this task assignment problem?
When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force strategy for this problem involves trying every possible way to assign tasks to servers. It's like manually testing out every conceivable arrangement to see which one works best. We will look at all combinations of task assignments.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def process_tasks_using_servers_brute_force(tasks, servers, capacity_per_server): number_of_tasks = len(tasks)
number_of_servers = len(servers)
best_assignment = None
best_cost = float('inf')
def calculate_cost(assignment): cost = 0
for server_index in range(number_of_servers):
server_tasks = [tasks[task_index] for task_index in range(number_of_tasks) if assignment[task_index] == server_index]
cost += sum(server_tasks)
return cost
def is_valid_assignment(assignment): server_loads = [0] * number_of_servers
for task_index in range(number_of_tasks):
server_index = assignment[task_index]
server_loads[server_index] += tasks[task_index]
for load in server_loads:
if load > capacity_per_server:
return False
return True
def find_assignments(task_index, current_assignment): nonlocal best_assignment, best_cost
# If we've assigned all tasks, check if the assignment is valid
if task_index == number_of_tasks:
if is_valid_assignment(current_assignment):
cost = calculate_cost(current_assignment)
# Evaluate if this assignment provides the lowest cost
if cost < best_cost:
best_cost = cost
best_assignment = current_assignment[:]
return
# Try assigning the current task to each server
for server_index in range(number_of_servers):
current_assignment[task_index] = server_index
# Recursively call the method to assign other tasks
find_assignments(task_index + 1, current_assignment)
current_assignment = [0] * number_of_tasks
find_assignments(0, current_assignment)
return best_assignment
The goal is to efficiently assign tasks to servers while minimizing the time it takes to complete all tasks. The optimal approach involves using a structure that keeps track of the time each server will be available and assigning tasks to the server that will be available soonest. This ensures we're always utilizing available resources in the best possible way.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
import heapq
def process_tasks(tasks, number_of_servers):
available_servers = []
# Initialize available servers with their initial availability time (0).
for server_id in range(number_of_servers):
heapq.heappush(available_servers, (0, server_id))
completion_times = []
for task_duration in tasks:
# Find the server that will be available the soonest.
available_time, server_id = heapq.heappop(available_servers)
completion_time = available_time + task_duration
completion_times.append(completion_time)
# Update the server's availability time after completing the task.
heapq.heappush(available_servers, (completion_time, server_id))
# The maximum completion time is the time when all tasks are done.
return max(completion_times)
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Tasks array is null or empty | Return an empty list or null, indicating no tasks to process. |
Servers array is null or empty | Return an empty list or null, indicating no servers available to process tasks. |
Tasks array has a very large number of tasks | The algorithm should be designed to scale, possibly using priority queues or load balancing techniques to avoid performance bottlenecks. |
Servers have vastly different processing capabilities (highly skewed processing power) | The scheduling algorithm should prioritize assigning tasks to the most capable servers first or use a weighted distribution strategy. |
Task processing times are extremely large, leading to potential integer overflow or long execution times. | Use appropriate data types (e.g., long instead of int) to store processing times and set time limits to prevent indefinite execution. |
Some tasks might be impossible to complete given the server capabilities (e.g., negative processing power). | Implement a mechanism to detect and handle these infeasible tasks, possibly by logging an error or skipping them. |
Server weights are all zero | Handle this case by evenly distributing load, skipping server, or throwing error based on specifications. |
Number of tasks is much smaller than number of servers | The algorithm should efficiently handle the case where some servers remain idle after processing all tasks. |