You are given an integer array nums
. Your task is to rotate the array to the right by k
steps, where k
is a non-negative integer. The rotation should be performed in-place if possible.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], k = 3
Output: [5,6,7,1,2,3,4]
Explanation:
Rotate 1 step to the right: [7,1,2,3,4,5,6]
Rotate 2 steps to the right: [6,7,1,2,3,4,5]
Rotate 3 steps to the right: [5,6,7,1,2,3,4]
Example 2:
Input: nums = [-1,-100,3,99], k = 2
Output: [3,99,-1,-100]
Explanation:
Rotate 1 step to the right: [99,-1,-100,3]
Rotate 2 steps to the right: [3,99,-1,-100]
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 10^5
-2^31 <= nums[i] <= 2^31 - 1
0 <= k <= 10^5
Could you provide an efficient solution for this problem, and what is the time and space complexity of your approach? Bonus points if you can do it in-place (O(1) extra space).
When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force method to rotate a list of items is like physically moving each item one by one. We essentially move the last item to the front a specified number of times, handling each move individually.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def rotate_array_brute_force(numbers, rotation_amount):
list_length = len(numbers)
# We take the modulo to avoid unnecessary rotations.
rotation_amount = rotation_amount % list_length
for _ in range(rotation_amount):
# Move the last element to the front.
last_element = numbers[-1]
# Remove the last element.
numbers.pop()
# Insert the last element at the beginning.
numbers.insert(0, last_element)
return numbers
Instead of shifting elements one by one, the optimal strategy involves reversing sections of the data to achieve the rotation in a clever way. Think of it like rearranging three parts of a block to get the final result more efficiently. This avoids repeatedly moving single elements.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def rotate_array(nums, rotation_steps):
array_length = len(nums)
rotation_steps %= array_length
def reverse_array_section(start_index, end_index):
while start_index < end_index:
nums[start_index], nums[end_index] = nums[end_index], nums[start_index]
start_index += 1
end_index -= 1
# Reverse the entire array to prepare for rotation.
reverse_array_section(0, array_length - 1)
# Reverse the first part of array, up to the rotation point.
reverse_array_section(0, rotation_steps - 1)
# Reverse the remaining array to complete the rotation.
reverse_array_section(rotation_steps, array_length - 1)
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Empty or null input array | Return immediately or throw an exception if modification is not allowed based on problem constraints. |
k is zero | No rotation needed, return the original array. |
k is equal to the array length | No rotation needed, return the original array as k % length will be 0. |
k is greater than the array length | Apply modulo operation (k % nums.length) to get the effective rotation count within the array bounds. |
Array contains only one element | No rotation is performed, return the original array. |
Array with negative numbers | The standard rotation algorithms work correctly with negative numbers. |
Large array size and large k value | Use a time and space efficient algorithm (e.g., reversal algorithm) to avoid exceeding time or memory limits. |
Integer overflow with large k and array length if intermediate calculations are performed naively | Ensure intermediate calculations such as index manipulations use appropriate data types to avoid overflow, or use modulo arithmetic correctly. |