You are given an m x n
binary matrix mat
of 1
's (representing soldiers) and 0
's (representing civilians). The soldiers are positioned in front of the civilians. That is, all the 1
's will appear to the left of all the 0
's in each row.
A row i
is weaker than a row j
if one of the following is true:
i
is less than the number of soldiers in row j
.i < j
.Return the indices of the k
weakest rows in the matrix ordered from weakest to strongest.
For example, consider the following matrix:
mat = [[1,1,0,0,0], [1,1,1,1,0], [1,0,0,0,0], [1,1,0,0,0], [1,1,1,1,1]]
and k = 3
The expected output would be [2,0,3]
because:
The number of soldiers in each row is:
The rows ordered from weakest to strongest are [2,0,3,1,4]
.
Write an algorithm to efficiently find the k weakest rows in the matrix. Consider the time and space complexity of your solution. Discuss any potential edge cases and how your algorithm handles them.
When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force approach to finding the weakest rows in a matrix involves directly calculating the 'strength' of each row and then sorting them. We consider every row individually without any initial assumptions. This is a straightforward, though potentially inefficient, method.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def k_weakest_rows(matrix, k):
row_strengths = []
for row_index in range(len(matrix)):
soldier_count = sum(matrix[row_index])
# Store row index and its strength to maintain original order later
row_strengths.append((row_index, soldier_count))
# Sort rows based on strength, using row index as tiebreaker
row_strengths.sort(key=lambda item: (item[1], item[0]))
weakest_rows = []
for i in range(k):
# Extract the row indices to return
weakest_rows.append(row_strengths[i][0])
return weakest_rows
The fastest way to find the weakest rows is to figure out the 'strength' of each row and then efficiently pick out the weakest ones. We'll use a clever search to quickly determine row strength, then a data structure to keep track of the weakest rows without fully sorting all the rows.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def k_weakest_rows(matrix, k):
number_of_rows = len(matrix)
row_strengths = []
def find_first_zero(row):
left_index = 0
right_index = len(row)
while left_index < right_index:
middle_index = (left_index + right_index) // 2
if row[middle_index] == 0:
right_index = middle_index
else:
left_index = middle_index + 1
return left_index
# Calculate strength of each row using binary search
for row_index in range(number_of_rows):
row_strengths.append((find_first_zero(matrix[row_index]), row_index))
# Sort the rows based on their strengths.
row_strengths.sort()
# Extract the indices of the k weakest rows.
weakest_row_indices = [row_strengths[i][1] for i in range(k)]
return weakest_row_indices
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Null or empty matrix | Return an empty list immediately as there are no rows to evaluate. |
Matrix with zero columns | The sum of rows will always be zero; handle ties based on row index. |
k is zero | Return an empty list since no rows are requested. |
k is greater than the number of rows | Return all rows sorted by strength in ascending order. |
All rows have the same number of soldiers (all 0s or all 1s) | The algorithm must maintain the original order of the rows as tie-breaker. |
Matrix with only one row | Return a list containing only the index 0 if k >= 1, otherwise empty list. |
Large matrix dimensions leading to potential memory issues (e.g., exceeding memory limits when storing row strengths) | Employ a heap-based solution with a fixed size of k to minimize memory usage. |
Integer overflow when calculating row strength (number of 1s) | Ensure that the matrix values are only 0 or 1, preventing overflow in calculating the sum. |