You are given a 0-indexed array nums
consisting of non-negative integers.
Consider the problem of calculating the sum of each subsequence of nums
. A subsequence of nums
is a list that can be derived from nums
by deleting some or no elements without changing the order of the remaining elements. Note that the empty subsequence is considered to have a sum of 0
.
Return the bitwise OR of all the subsequence sums.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [2,1,3] Output: 7 Explanation: There are 8 possible subsequences: - The subsequence [] has a sum of 0. - The subsequence [2] has a sum of 2. - The subsequence [1] has a sum of 1. - The subsequence [3] has a sum of 3. - The subsequence [2,1] has a sum of 3. - The subsequence [2,3] has a sum of 5. - The subsequence [1,3] has a sum of 4. - The subsequence [2,1,3] has a sum of 6. The bitwise OR of these values is 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 = 7.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [5,11,3] Output: 15 Explanation: The bitwise OR of all subsequence sums is 15.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 105
0 <= nums[i] <= 1000
When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force strategy in this problem is all about trying every possible combination. We're going to find every possible subsequence sum, and then combine them in a specific way to get our final answer.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def bitwise_or_of_subsequence_sums(numbers):
subsequence_sums = []
# Generate all possible subsequences
for i in range(1 << len(numbers)):
subsequence = []
current_sum = 0
for j in range(len(numbers)):
# Check if j-th element is included in the current subsequence
if (i >> j) & 1:
subsequence.append(numbers[j])
current_sum += numbers[j]
subsequence_sums.append(current_sum)
# Initialize result to 0 to handle the case of an empty input
bitwise_or_result = 0
# Calculate bitwise OR of all subsequence sums
# Necessary to cover all combinations
for subsequence_sum in subsequence_sums:
bitwise_or_result |= subsequence_sum
return bitwise_or_result
Instead of calculating every single possible sum of subsequences, the optimal approach cleverly uses bitwise operations to directly construct the final answer. The core idea is that if any number in the original set has a particular bit set to one, then that bit will definitely be set to one in the final result.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def bitwise_or_of_subsequence_sums(numbers):
bitwise_or_result = 0
# Iterate through each number in the input set.
for number in numbers:
# Accumulate the bitwise OR. If a bit is set in any number, it will be set in result.
bitwise_or_result |= number
# The bitwise OR of all numbers represents bitwise OR of all subsequence sums.
return bitwise_or_result
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Empty or null input array | Return 0 since there are no subsequences and the OR of nothing is 0. |
Array with a single element | Return the single element as it's the only subsequence sum. |
Array with all zero values | Return 0, as all subsequence sums will be zero. |
Array with large positive integers that could cause integer overflow when summed | Use a data type with sufficient capacity (e.g., long) to store intermediate sums. |
Maximum sized input array (scalability) | The powerset approach inherent in subsequence generation should be optimized or a dynamic programming solution might be necessary. |
Array containing one very large number and many small numbers. | The large number will likely dominate the final OR result, influencing the order of calculations. |
Array containing only powers of 2. | The OR operation will result in the sum of the distinct powers of 2, potentially requiring careful analysis of bitwise operations. |
Array with duplicate large values that may cause overflow if naively added repeatedly. | Using a `long` datatype will handle this overflow, and the duplication will not change the correctness of the OR operation. |