You are given a binary string s
. A subsequence of s
is considered good if it is not empty and has a value that is a power of 5
.
s = "1011"
, then "1"
, "11"
, "101"
, and "1011"
are some of its subsequences. Among these, only the subsequence "101"
has a value of 5
, which is a power of 5
.Return the number of good subsequences in s
. Since the answer may be large, return it modulo 109 + 7
.
s = "101"
, then its value is 5
.Example 1:
Input: s = "000" Output: 0 Explanation: There are no good subsequences, so we return 0.
Example 2:
Input: s = "1011" Output: 5 Explanation: The good subsequences are "1", "1", "101", "11", and "1011".
Example 3:
Input: s = "0110" Output: 2 Explanation: The good subsequences are "10" and "10".
Constraints:
1 <= s.length <= 104
s[i]
is either '0'
or '1'
.When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force approach involves checking every possible subsequence in the given input. We'll examine each subsequence individually to see if it satisfies a certain property that defines a 'good' subsequence. By checking everything, we guarantee we'll find all the good ones.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def count_good_subsequences_brute_force(sequence):
list_length = len(sequence)
good_subsequence_count = 0
# Iterate through all possible subsequences
for i in range(1 << list_length):
subsequence = []
for j in range(list_length):
# Check if the j-th element is included in the subsequence
if (i >> j) & 1:
subsequence.append(sequence[j])
#Now we are calling the 'is_good' function to check
#if it is a valid subsequence and increment
if is_good_subsequence(subsequence):
good_subsequence_count += 1
return good_subsequence_count
def is_good_subsequence(subsequence):
# This is a placeholder; replace with your 'good' criteria
# Currently, it makes any non-empty subsequence 'good'
return len(subsequence) > 0
The problem asks to find how many subsequences of a given sequence meet a specific condition. Instead of checking all possible subsequences individually, we can use a more efficient method that builds up the answer step-by-step, leveraging previous calculations to avoid redundant work. The key idea is to count the number of valid subsequences ending at each position in the sequence.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def count_good_subsequences(sequence):
ends_with_counts = {}
for element in sequence:
# Store counts of subsequences before update.
previous_counts = ends_with_counts.copy()
# Add 'element' to existing subsequences.
for value, count in previous_counts.items():
if element > value:
ends_with_counts[element] = ends_with_counts.get(element, 0) + count
# Initialize if 'element' creates a new subsequence.
ends_with_counts[element] = ends_with_counts.get(element, 0) + 1
# Sum all counts for total good subsequences
total_subsequences = sum(ends_with_counts.values())
return total_subsequences
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Empty input array | Return 0 as there are no subsequences. |
Array with a single element | Return 0 as a subsequence needs at least one character |
Input array contains only zeros | The count should accurately reflect the number of subsequences that sum to a multiple of the divisor |
Large input array with large numbers, potential overflow during sum | Use modulo arithmetic during summation to prevent integer overflow if intermediate sums can get very large. |
Input array containing negative numbers | The algorithm should handle negative numbers correctly by considering their contribution to the sum and subsequence count. |
Large input array with divisor being a large number. | Modulo operation should be performed carefully with large numbers involved. |
All elements in the array are the same | Ensure combination calculations avoid redundancy. |
Divisor is zero | Throw an exception or return an error code as division by zero is undefined. |