You are given an encoded string s. To decode the string to a tape, the encoded string is read one character at a time and the following steps are taken:
d, the entire current tape is repeatedly written d - 1 more times in total.Given an integer k, return the kth letter (1-indexed) in the decoded string.
Example 1:
Input: s = "leet2code3", k = 10 Output: "o" Explanation: The decoded string is "leetleetcodeleetleetcodeleetleetcode". The 10th letter in the string is "o".
Example 2:
Input: s = "ha22", k = 5 Output: "h" Explanation: The decoded string is "hahahaha". The 5th letter is "h".
Example 3:
Input: s = "a2345678999999999999999", k = 1 Output: "a" Explanation: The decoded string is "a" repeated 8301530446056247680 times. The 1st letter is "a".
Constraints:
2 <= s.length <= 100s consists of lowercase English letters and digits 2 through 9.s starts with a letter.1 <= k <= 109k is less than or equal to the length of the decoded string.263 letters.When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The problem involves decoding a string that is encoded with repeating substrings. The brute force approach involves fully expanding the encoded string to its decoded form and then directly accessing the character at the target index.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def decode_string_at_index_brute_force(encoded_string, target_index): decoded_string = ""
for character in encoded_string:
if character.isalpha():
decoded_string += character
else:
# If a digit is found, repeat the previous substring
repeat_count = int(character)
last_substring = ""
string_length = len(decoded_string)
for string_index in range(string_length):
last_substring += decoded_string[string_index]
original_decoded_string_length = len(decoded_string)
for _ in range(repeat_count - 1):
decoded_string += last_substring
# After decoding, return the character at the target index
return decoded_string[target_index]The goal is to find a single character in a very long, potentially repeated string. Instead of fully constructing the decoded string, which would be too slow, we work backwards to figure out where the character at the target position originated from in the original encoded string. This avoids dealing with the entire long string at any point.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def decoded_string_at_index(encoded_string, target_index): decoded_length = 0
for char in encoded_string:
if char.isdigit():
decoded_length *= int(char)
else:
decoded_length += 1
for i in range(len(encoded_string) - 1, -1, -1):
char = encoded_string[i]
if char.isdigit():
digit = int(char)
decoded_length //= digit
# Reduce target index using the modulo operator.
target_index %= decoded_length
else:
# Check if current length matches the target.
if decoded_length == target_index or (target_index == 0 and decoded_length >= 1):
return char
decoded_length -= 1
return ""| Case | How to Handle |
|---|---|
| Empty string S | Return empty string immediately as there is no decoded string at any index. |
| Index K is 0 | If K is 0, there is no character, but depending on the interpretation, return '' or handle it as an invalid input. |
| String S contains only digits | Repeated string will quickly become very large; handle with modulo and length reduction from end. |
| String S contains only characters | Simple string traversal and return character at index K if K < length(S). |
| Large index K exceeding possible string length | Use modulo operation to reduce K relative to the dynamically computed length before decoding. |
| Integer overflow when calculating decoded string length | Use long data type to prevent integer overflow when calculating decoded string length, before applying the modulo operator. |
| S contains multiple repeating sections such as a2b3c2 | Reduce index K from the end, factoring in each section's repetition count and length. |
| Maximum-sized string and maximum-sized index | Optimize length calculation and index reduction to avoid timeouts due to extremely large values by applying modulo progressively. |