Winston was given the above mysterious function func
. He has an integer array arr
and an integer target
and he wants to find the values l
and r
that make the value |func(arr, l, r) - target|
minimum possible.
Return the minimum possible value of |func(arr, l, r) - target|
.
Notice that func
should be called with the values l
and r
where 0 <= l, r < arr.length
.
Example 1:
Input: arr = [9,12,3,7,15], target = 5 Output: 2 Explanation: Calling func with all the pairs of [l,r] = [[0,0],[1,1],[2,2],[3,3],[4,4],[0,1],[1,2],[2,3],[3,4],[0,2],[1,3],[2,4],[0,3],[1,4],[0,4]], Winston got the following results [9,12,3,7,15,8,0,3,7,0,0,3,0,0,0]. The value closest to 5 is 7 and 3, thus the minimum difference is 2.
Example 2:
Input: arr = [1000000,1000000,1000000], target = 1 Output: 999999 Explanation: Winston called the func with all possible values of [l,r] and he always got 1000000, thus the min difference is 999999.
Example 3:
Input: arr = [1,2,4,8,16], target = 0 Output: 0
Constraints:
1 <= arr.length <= 105
1 <= arr[i] <= 106
0 <= target <= 107
When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
We are given a function that's hard to understand directly, and a target value. The brute force approach involves computing the function for every possible input and comparing the results to the target. We want to find the function's output value that is closest to our target.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def find_closest_value_brute_force(possible_inputs, mysterious_function, target_value):
closest_value = None
smallest_difference = float('inf')
# Iterate through all possible inputs to the mysterious function
for current_input in possible_inputs:
function_result = mysterious_function(current_input)
# Calculate the difference between the function result and the target value
current_difference = abs(function_result - target_value)
# Check if the current difference is smaller than the smallest difference seen so far
# If so, update the closest value and smallest difference
if current_difference < smallest_difference:
#Update smallest difference
smallest_difference = current_difference
#Update closest function value found so far
closest_value = function_result
# Return the closest value found
return closest_value
The key to solving this problem efficiently lies in exploiting the function's properties. By understanding how the function behaves, we can use a process of elimination to quickly narrow down the search area and pinpoint the value closest to the target, without exhaustively checking every possibility. This method is like a guessing game where each guess cleverly informs the next.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def find_best_value(function, target, low_range, high_range):
best_value = low_range
closest_difference = abs(function(low_range) - target)
while low_range <= high_range:
# Calculate midpoint to narrow search space
midpoint = (low_range + high_range) // 2
function_value = function(midpoint)
difference = abs(function_value - target)
# Update best value if current difference is smaller
if difference < closest_difference:
closest_difference = difference
best_value = midpoint
# Adjust search range based on function value relative to target
if function_value < target:
low_range = midpoint + 1
else:
high_range = midpoint - 1
return best_value
def find_closest_value(function, target, initial_guess):
current_input = initial_guess
step_size = 1
best_input = initial_guess
min_difference = abs(function(initial_guess) - target)
# Determine initial direction to search
if function(initial_guess) < target:
direction = 1
else:
direction = -1
# Iterate until function moves away from the target
while True:
next_input = current_input + direction * step_size
current_value = function(next_input)
current_difference = abs(current_value - target)
# Update best input if this input is better
if current_difference < min_difference:
min_difference = current_difference
best_input = next_input
current_input = next_input
else:
# Step size is reduced when we move away
if step_size == 1:
return best_input
else:
return best_input
def mysterious_function_solver(function, target, is_monotonic):
if is_monotonic:
# If function is monotonic, use binary search
best_value = find_best_value(function, target, -100, 100)
return best_value
else:
# If function is non-monotonic, use iterative search
initial_guess = 0
best_value = find_closest_value(function, target, initial_guess)
# Compare output to target to find input that yields closest output
return best_value
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Empty or null input array | Return positive infinity or throw an exception as no valid AND value exists. |
Array with a single element | Return the absolute difference between the element and the target (f(x,x) = x). |
Array with all elements being zero | Return absolute difference between 0 and target, as all AND results will be zero. |
Large input array causing performance issues | Optimize by using prefix AND array or pruning based on bitwise properties to reduce comparisons. |
Target value is very large | The bitwise AND will be smaller than any input number, so it is safe to only check smaller numbers and return absolute difference to the target. |
Integer overflow during bitwise AND operation | The bitwise AND operation should not cause an overflow since the result will always be less than or equal to both operands. |
Array contains negative numbers | Bitwise AND works with negative numbers but must consider how negative numbers are represented (two's complement) and their impact on proximity to the target. |
Array contains a large number of duplicate elements | The number of duplicate elements can be reduced by pre-processing using set data structure. |