You are given an integer array nums
. Your task is to remove all elements from the array by performing one of the following operations at each step until nums
is empty:
nums
and remove them. The cost of this operation is the maximum of the two elements removed.nums
, remove all the remaining elements in a single operation. The cost of this operation is the maximum of the remaining elements.Return the minimum cost required to remove all the elements.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [6,2,8,4]
Output: 12
Explanation:
Initially, nums = [6, 2, 8, 4]
.
nums[0] = 6
and nums[2] = 8
with a cost of max(6, 8) = 8
. Now, nums = [2, 4]
.max(2, 4) = 4
.The cost to remove all elements is 8 + 4 = 12
. This is the minimum cost to remove all elements in nums
. Hence, the output is 12.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [2,1,3,3]
Output: 5
Explanation:
Initially, nums = [2, 1, 3, 3]
.
nums[0] = 2
and nums[1] = 1
with a cost of max(2, 1) = 2
. Now, nums = [3, 3]
.max(3, 3) = 3
.The cost to remove all elements is 2 + 3 = 5
. This is the minimum cost to remove all elements in nums
. Hence, the output is 5.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 1000
1 <= nums[i] <= 106
When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force approach to finding the minimum cost to remove elements involves checking absolutely every possible combination of element removals. It is similar to trying every single possibility until you find the best one. We will systematically go through each combination and calculate the cost.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def find_minimum_cost_to_remove_array_elements_brute_force(input_array, removal_costs, target_sum):
minimum_removal_cost = float('inf')
number_of_elements = len(input_array)
# Iterate through all possible subsets of elements to remove.
for i in range(2 ** number_of_elements):
elements_to_remove = []
removal_cost_for_subset = 0
remaining_elements = []
for j in range(number_of_elements):
# Check if the j-th element is in the current subset to remove
if (i >> j) & 1:
elements_to_remove.append(j)
removal_cost_for_subset += removal_costs[j]
else:
remaining_elements.append(input_array[j])
# Calculate the sum of the remaining elements
sum_of_remaining_elements = sum(remaining_elements)
# Check if the sum meets the target constraint
if sum_of_remaining_elements <= target_sum:
# Update the minimum cost if the current cost is lower.
minimum_removal_cost = min(minimum_removal_cost, removal_cost_for_subset)
# If no valid removal found, return -1.
if minimum_removal_cost == float('inf'):
return -1
else:
return minimum_removal_cost
The core idea is to use a method that remembers the best solutions to smaller versions of the problem to solve the bigger problem efficiently. We break down the problem into subproblems and reuse the solutions. This prevents recalculating the same thing multiple times.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def find_minimum_cost_to_remove_array_elements(array, cost_to_remove, group_condition):
number_of_elements = len(array)
minimum_removal_costs = [0] * (number_of_elements + 1)
for i in range(1, number_of_elements + 1):
minimum_removal_costs[i] = minimum_removal_costs[i-1] + cost_to_remove[i-1]
# Assume we remove current element.
for j in range(i - 1, -1, -1):
# Check all previous removal spots to see if we *don't* remove current element.
sub_array = array[j:i]
if group_condition(sub_array):
#If removing the elements from j to i is acceptable
minimum_removal_costs[i] = min(minimum_removal_costs[i],
minimum_removal_costs[j])
return minimum_removal_costs[number_of_elements]
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Null or empty input array | Return 0 since there are no elements to remove, therefore no cost. |
Array with one element | Return the value of the single element since it must be removed to satisfy the condition. |
Array with two elements | Return the minimum of the two elements, as removing the larger one will satisfy the condition with minimal cost. |
Array with all elements having the same value | The solution should still function correctly and efficiently converge to the optimal solution. |
Large input array size (scalability) | The solution needs to be optimized for time complexity, ideally using dynamic programming to avoid exponential time complexity. |
Array with very large integer values (potential integer overflow) | Use data types like `long` or consider using a programming language with built-in arbitrary-precision arithmetic to prevent integer overflow during summation of costs. |
Array with alternating large and small values | The algorithm should correctly explore all possible removal combinations to arrive at the global minimum, not getting stuck in local minima. |
Array with all positive integers. | The dynamic programming should still calculate cost correctly if all integers are positive. |