You are given an integer array accounts where accounts[i][j] is the amount of money the ith customer has in the jth bank. Return the wealth that the richest customer has.
A customer's wealth is the amount of money they have in all their bank accounts. The richest customer is the customer that has the maximum wealth.
Example 1:
Input: accounts = [[1,2,3],[3,2,1]] Output: 6 Explanation: 1st customer has wealth = 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 2nd customer has wealth = 3 + 2 + 1 = 6 Both customers are considered the richest with a wealth of 6, so return 6.
Example 2:
Input: accounts = [[1,5],[7,3],[3,5]] Output: 10 Explanation: 1st customer has wealth = 6 2nd customer has wealth = 10 3rd customer has wealth = 8 The 2nd customer is the richest with a wealth of 10.
Example 3:
Input: accounts = [[2,8,7],[7,1,3],[1,9,5]] Output: 17
Constraints:
m == accounts.lengthn == accounts[i].length1 <= m, n <= 501 <= accounts[i][j] <= 100When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force approach to finding the largest number in a collection involves examining each number individually. We start by assuming the first number is the largest, then compare it against every other number in the collection. If we find a bigger number, we update our assumption of which number is the largest.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def find_index_of_the_large_integer(list_of_numbers):
if not list_of_numbers:
return -1
# Assume the first element is the largest to start.
index_of_largest_number_seen_so_far = 0
for current_index in range(1, len(list_of_numbers)):
# If we find a larger number, update the index.
if list_of_numbers[current_index] > list_of_numbers[index_of_largest_number_seen_so_far]:
index_of_largest_number_seen_so_far = current_index
# Update largest number
return index_of_largest_number_seen_so_farThe efficient way to find the largest number is to avoid comparing every single number. We can use a divide and conquer strategy similar to how you would find a word in a dictionary. This narrows down the search quickly.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def find_peak_element_index(numbers):
left_index = 0
right_index = len(numbers) - 1
while left_index < right_index:
middle_index = (left_index + right_index) // 2
# Check if middle element is greater than its neighbors.
if numbers[middle_index] > numbers[middle_index - 1] and \
numbers[middle_index] > numbers[middle_index + 1]:
return middle_index
# If the right neighbor is greater, search the right half.
if numbers[middle_index + 1] > numbers[middle_index]:
left_index = middle_index + 1
# Otherwise, search the left half.
else:
right_index = middle_index
# When left and right indices converge, it's the peak.
return left_index| Case | How to Handle |
|---|---|
| Null or empty input array | Return -1 or throw an IllegalArgumentException, depending on requirements. |
| Array with only one element | Return 0 since it's the largest element or throw an exception since there is no element to compare to. |
| Array with all identical values | Return 0 as the index of the first element since it is equal to any other element in the array or the problem should specify what to return in case of a tie. |
| Array with extremely large numbers (potential integer overflow) | Use long data type to store the numbers and perform comparisons. |
| Array with negative numbers | The algorithm should correctly handle negative numbers by comparing them according to their numerical value. |
| Maximum sized input array (memory constraints) | Ensure the solution uses memory efficiently, considering in-place operations or streaming if possible. |
| Array containing zeros | The algorithm should correctly compare zeros with other positive and negative numbers. |
| Extremely skewed distribution with one very large number. | The algorithm should efficiently identify the largest number without being significantly impacted by the range of values. |