You are given an array nums which is a permutation of [0, 1, 2, ..., n - 1]. The score of any permutation of [0, 1, 2, ..., n - 1] named perm is defined as:
score(perm) = |perm[0] - nums[perm[1]]| + |perm[1] - nums[perm[2]]| + ... + |perm[n - 1] - nums[perm[0]]|
Return the permutation perm which has the minimum possible score. If multiple permutations exist with this score, return the one that is lexicographically smallest among them.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,0,2]
Output: [0,1,2]
Explanation:

The lexicographically smallest permutation with minimum cost is [0,1,2]. The cost of this permutation is |0 - 0| + |1 - 2| + |2 - 1| = 2.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [0,2,1]
Output: [0,2,1]
Explanation:

The lexicographically smallest permutation with minimum cost is [0,2,1]. The cost of this permutation is |0 - 1| + |2 - 2| + |1 - 0| = 2.
Constraints:
2 <= n == nums.length <= 14nums is a permutation of [0, 1, 2, ..., n - 1].When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force strategy is to try every single possible arrangement of the numbers in the list. For each arrangement, we calculate the total cost and then find the smallest cost among all the arrangements.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def find_minimum_cost_array_permutation_brute_force(numbers):
import itertools
minimum_cost = float('inf')
# Generate all possible permutations of the input numbers
for permutation in itertools.permutations(numbers):
# Calculate the cost of the current permutation.
current_cost = calculate_cost(list(permutation))
# Update the minimum cost if the current cost is lower.
if current_cost < minimum_cost:
minimum_cost = current_cost
return minimum_cost
def calculate_cost(permutation):
total_cost = 0
for i in range(len(permutation) - 1):
total_cost += abs(permutation[i] - permutation[i + 1])
return total_costThe goal is to arrange two lists of numbers to minimize a total cost. The key idea is to pair the smallest number from one list with the smallest number from the other list, and the largest with the largest, and so on. This strategy avoids large differences that would increase the cost.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def find_minimum_cost_array_permutation(first_array, second_array):
first_array.sort()
second_array.sort()
# Sorting both arrays is crucial to minimize cost.
minimum_total_cost = 0
for index in range(len(first_array)):
# Iterate through the sorted arrays to calculate cost.
cost = abs(first_array[index] - second_array[index])
minimum_total_cost += cost
return minimum_total_cost| Case | How to Handle |
|---|---|
| Empty or null input arrays | Return 0 immediately as there is no permutation to calculate the cost of. |
| Arrays with one element | Return 0 immediately, as a permutation is trivial and has no cost. |
| Arrays with two elements | Compute the cost of the only two permutations (original and swapped) and return the minimum. |
| Arrays with all identical elements | The cost will always be the same regardless of permutation, so return the calculated cost of any valid permutation. |
| Input arrays with negative numbers or zeros. | Ensure the cost function correctly handles negative values and/or zero values without causing errors (e.g., division by zero). |
| Very large arrays that might cause memory issues during permutation generation. | Employ a dynamic programming or greedy approach to avoid generating all permutations explicitly. |
| Integer overflow in cost calculation when multiplying or summing large numbers | Use a data type with a larger range (e.g., long long in C++, long in Java) or consider modulo operation to prevent overflow. |
| Arrays with a nearly sorted order or reverse sorted order | The optimal permutation could be close to the original order, so standard sorting may not suffice; explore other permutation strategies. |