You own a Goal Parser that can interpret a string command. The command consists of an alphabet of "G", "()" and/or "(al)" in some order. The Goal Parser will interpret "G" as the string "G", "()" as the string "o", and "(al)" as the string "al". The interpreted strings are then concatenated in the original order.
Given the string command, return the Goal Parser's interpretation of command.
Example 1:
Input: command = "G()(al)" Output: "Goal" Explanation: The Goal Parser interprets the command as follows: G -> G () -> o (al) -> al The final concatenated result is "Goal".
Example 2:
Input: command = "G()()()()(al)" Output: "Gooooal"
Example 3:
Input: command = "(al)G(al)()()G" Output: "alGalooG"
Constraints:
1 <= command.length <= 100command consists of "G", "()", and/or "(al)" in some order.When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
We need to translate a coded message. The brute force method simply goes through the message character by character, checking for specific patterns.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def interpret_goal_parser(command): interpreted_string = "" index = 0
while index < len(command):
# If we see a 'G', just add it to the result.
if command[index] == 'G':
interpreted_string += 'G'
index += 1
elif command[index] == '(': # Check if it's '()' or '(al)'
if command[index + 1] == ')':
interpreted_string += 'o'
index += 2
else:
# Handle the '(al)' case.
interpreted_string += 'al'
index += 4
else:
index += 1
return interpreted_stringThe most efficient way to interpret the goal command is to read it character by character and translate it as you go. Instead of looking for complex patterns, focus on what each specific piece means and build the result directly.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def interpret_goal_parser(command):
interpreted_string = ""
index = 0
command_length = len(command)
while index < command_length:
# Check for 'G' to add 'G' to output.
if command[index] == 'G':
interpreted_string += 'G'
index += 1
# Check for '()' to add 'o' to output.
elif command[index] == '(' and command[index + 1] == ')':
interpreted_string += 'o'
index += 2
#The remaining option must be (al) so we add "al" to the output
else:
interpreted_string += 'al'
index += 4
return interpreted_string| Case | How to Handle |
|---|---|
| Null or empty goal string | Return an empty string immediately, as there is nothing to parse. |
| Goal string contains only 'G' | The interpreter should return 'G' itself, as there are no parentheses to interpret. |
| Goal string contains only '()' | The interpreter should return 'o' repeated for each '()'. |
| Goal string contains only '(al)' | The interpreter should return 'al' repeated for each '(al)'. |
| Goal string starts or ends with an incomplete sequence like '(' or '(a' | The interpreter should ignore or return an error string depending on requirements; a robust implementation might throw an exception or log an error and continue. |
| Goal string with mixed valid and invalid sequences, e.g., 'G()al(a' | The interpreter should process the valid sequences and either ignore the invalid or return an appropriate error message. |
| Extremely long goal string to test performance (e.g., 10^5 characters) | The solution should scale linearly with the length of the input string to avoid timeouts; using string concatenation directly is inefficient, a string builder/buffer should be used. |
| Goal string containing nested or overlapping parentheses, e.g., '(()al)' or '(al)(al)' | The problem description implies simple sequential parsing, so the solution should handle overlapping parenthesis in sequential manner from left to right. |