You are given an integer array nums of length n, and an integer array queries of length m.
Return an array answer of length m where answer[i] is the maximum size of a subsequence that you can take from nums such that the sum of its elements is less than or equal to queries[i].
A subsequence is an array that can be derived from another array by deleting some or no elements without changing the order of the remaining elements.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [4,5,2,1], queries = [3,10,21] Output: [2,3,4] Explanation: We answer the queries as follows: - The subsequence [2,1] has a sum less than or equal to 3. It can be proven that 2 is the maximum size of such a subsequence, so answer[0] = 2. - The subsequence [4,5,1] has a sum less than or equal to 10. It can be proven that 3 is the maximum size of such a subsequence, so answer[1] = 3. - The subsequence [4,5,2,1] has a sum less than or equal to 21. It can be proven that 4 is the maximum size of such a subsequence, so answer[2] = 4.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [2,3,4,5], queries = [1] Output: [0] Explanation: The empty subsequence is the only subsequence that has a sum less than or equal to 1, so answer[0] = 0.
Constraints:
n == nums.lengthm == queries.length1 <= n, m <= 10001 <= nums[i], queries[i] <= 106When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force approach to finding the longest subsequence with a limited sum involves trying every possible combination of numbers. We check each combination to see if its sum is within the limit. We then keep track of the longest sequence we found that meets the sum limit.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def longest_subsequence_with_limited_sum_brute_force(numbers, limit):
longest_subsequence_length = 0
# Iterate through all possible subsequences
for i in range(1 << len(numbers)):
current_subsequence = []
# Build the current subsequence based on the bitmask
for j in range(len(numbers)):
if (i >> j) & 1:
current_subsequence.append(numbers[j])
#Calculate sum of current subsequence
current_sum = sum(current_subsequence)
# Check if sum is within the limit
if current_sum <= limit:
#Update if this is the longest valid subsequence so far
longest_subsequence_length = max(longest_subsequence_length, len(current_subsequence))
return longest_subsequence_lengthThe best way to find the longest subsequence is to first sort the numbers from smallest to largest. Then, for each limit, we greedily take as many of the smallest numbers as we can without exceeding that limit. This guarantees we get the longest possible subsequence for that limit.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def longest_subsequence(numbers, queries):
numbers.sort()
result = []
for query in queries:
current_sum = 0
count = 0
#Greedily add smallest elements
for number in numbers:
if current_sum + number <= query:
current_sum += number
count += 1
else:
break
result.append(count)
return result| Case | How to Handle |
|---|---|
| Empty nums array or empty queries array | Return an empty result array immediately as there are no numbers to process or no queries to answer. |
| nums array contains negative numbers | The problem statement implies non-negative integers, so clarify the constraint; if negatives are allowed, the solution needs to handle them (e.g., using absolute values or adjusting the logic). |
| queries array contains zero or very small values | The longest subsequence will likely be empty or very short; the solution should correctly identify these cases without errors. |
| nums array contains extremely large numbers close to the maximum integer value | Potential integer overflow in prefix sum calculations; use a larger data type (long) if necessary. |
| queries array contains extremely large values exceeding the sum of all nums | The result should be the length of the entire nums array, as all elements can be included in the subsequence. |
| nums array contains duplicate numbers of varying frequencies | The sorting approach will handle duplicates correctly, as the order of elements with the same value does not affect the final subsequence length. |
| nums array is very large (e.g., 10^5) and queries array is also very large | Sorting nums is O(n log n), and each query is O(n) for a brute-force prefix sum approach; a more efficient approach (e.g., binary search after sorting) is needed to avoid exceeding time limits. |
| All numbers in the nums array are zero | The longest subsequence will be the length of nums if the query value is non-zero, and 0 if the query value is zero, and this should be handled correctly. |