You are given a 0-indexed integer array nums.
A subsequence of nums having length k and consisting of indices i0 < i1 < ... < ik-1 is balanced if the following holds:
nums[ij] - nums[ij-1] >= ij - ij-1, for every j in the range [1, k - 1].A subsequence of nums having length 1 is considered balanced.
Return an integer denoting the maximum possible sum of elements in a balanced subsequence of nums.
A subsequence of an array is a new non-empty array that is formed from the original array by deleting some (possibly none) of the elements without disturbing the relative positions of the remaining elements.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [3,3,5,6] Output: 14 Explanation: In this example, the subsequence [3,5,6] consisting of indices 0, 2, and 3 can be selected. nums[2] - nums[0] >= 2 - 0. nums[3] - nums[2] >= 3 - 2. Hence, it is a balanced subsequence, and its sum is the maximum among the balanced subsequences of nums. The subsequence consisting of indices 1, 2, and 3 is also valid. It can be shown that it is not possible to get a balanced subsequence with a sum greater than 14.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [5,-1,-3,8] Output: 13 Explanation: In this example, the subsequence [5,8] consisting of indices 0 and 3 can be selected. nums[3] - nums[0] >= 3 - 0. Hence, it is a balanced subsequence, and its sum is the maximum among the balanced subsequences of nums. It can be shown that it is not possible to get a balanced subsequence with a sum greater than 13.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [-2,-1] Output: -1 Explanation: In this example, the subsequence [-1] can be selected. It is a balanced subsequence, and its sum is the maximum among the balanced subsequences of nums.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 105-109 <= nums[i] <= 109When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force approach solves this problem by checking absolutely every possible subsequence. We examine each possible combination of numbers to see if it fits our rules and gives us the best result.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def maximum_balanced_subsequence_sum_brute_force(numbers):
max_subsequence_sum = float('-inf')
number_of_numbers = len(numbers)
# Iterate through all possible subsequences
for i in range(1 << number_of_numbers):
subsequence = []
for j in range(number_of_numbers):
# Check if the j-th bit is set in i
if (i >> j) & 1:
subsequence.append(numbers[j])
is_balanced = True
for index, number in enumerate(subsequence):
# Check if the subsequence is balanced
if number < subsequence.index(number) + 1:
is_balanced = False
break
if is_balanced:
current_subsequence_sum = sum(subsequence)
# Keep track of the largest balanced subsequence
max_subsequence_sum = max(max_subsequence_sum, current_subsequence_sum)
if max_subsequence_sum == float('-inf'):
return 0
return max_subsequence_sumThe most efficient approach is to use a data structure that helps us keep track of the best possible sums we can achieve up to a certain point, while also considering the constraints. This way, we avoid recomputing the same information repeatedly and arrive at the final answer quicker. We maintain a record of the best sums we have found so far for all possible 'end points' that satisfy a condition.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def maximum_balanced_subsequence_sum(numbers):
modified_numbers = [numbers[i] - i for i in range(len(numbers))]
best_sums = {}
for i, modified_number in enumerate(modified_numbers):
if modified_number < 0:
continue
current_best_sum = 0
# Find the best sum achievable before this number
for key in best_sums:
if key <= modified_number:
current_best_sum = max(current_best_sum, best_sums[key])
new_sum = current_best_sum + modified_number
# Update the best sums with the new sum if it's better
update = True
for key in list(best_sums.keys()):
if key >= modified_number and best_sums[key] >= new_sum:
update = False
break
if key <= modified_number and best_sums[key] <= new_sum:
del best_sums[key]
if update:
best_sums[modified_number] = new_sum
max_sum = 0
# Find the maximum sum among all achievable sums
for key in best_sums:
max_sum = max(max_sum, best_sums[key])
return max_sum| Case | How to Handle |
|---|---|
| Empty input array | Return 0, as there's no subsequence to sum. |
| Array with a single element | Return the element if it's non-negative; otherwise, return 0. |
| Array with all negative numbers | Return 0, as an empty subsequence is always a valid solution with sum 0. |
| Array with all zeros | Return 0 if the balance condition requires strictly increasing indices, otherwise return the sum of all zeros. |
| Large input array with numbers close to the maximum integer value | Use long to prevent integer overflow during summation and address scalability constraints with efficient algorithms. |
| Large input array with numbers close to the minimum integer value | Use long to prevent integer overflow during summation and address scalability constraints with efficient algorithms. |
| Array with elements that satisfy nums[i] > i (no valid subsequence) | Return 0 as no single element satisfies the condition and therefore no subsequence does either. |
| Array with a mix of large positive and large negative values that nearly cancel out | The algorithm must correctly handle negative intermediate sums in the dynamic programming or greedy approach. |