Given a string s of zeros and ones, return the maximum score after splitting the string into two non-empty substrings (i.e. left substring and right substring).
The score after splitting a string is the number of zeros in the left substring plus the number of ones in the right substring.
Example 1:
Input: s = "011101" Output: 5 Explanation: All possible ways of splitting s into two non-empty substrings are: left = "0" and right = "11101", score = 1 + 4 = 5 left = "01" and right = "1101", score = 1 + 3 = 4 left = "011" and right = "101", score = 1 + 2 = 3 left = "0111" and right = "01", score = 1 + 1 = 2 left = "01110" and right = "1", score = 2 + 1 = 3
Example 2:
Input: s = "00111" Output: 5 Explanation: When left = "00" and right = "111", we get the maximum score = 2 + 3 = 5
Example 3:
Input: s = "1111" Output: 3
Constraints:
2 <= s.length <= 500s consists of characters '0' and '1' only.When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force approach to this problem is like trying every single way to cut the string into two pieces. We calculate a score for each way we cut it. The goal is to find the highest possible score across all the cuts.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def max_score_after_splitting_string(string_of_zeros_and_ones):
max_score = 0
# Iterate through all possible split positions
for split_position in range(1, len(string_of_zeros_and_ones)):
left_substring = string_of_zeros_and_ones[:split_position]
right_substring = string_of_zeros_and_ones[split_position:]
# Count zeros in the left substring.
zeros_in_left = left_substring.count('0')
# Count ones in the right substring
ones_in_right = right_substring.count('1')
current_score = zeros_in_left + ones_in_right
#Update max score if we found a better score
if current_score > max_score:
max_score = current_score
return max_scoreThe goal is to find the best spot to cut the string so the score is highest. The clever trick is to count the number of zeros on the left and ones on the right without recalculating everything each time, saving a lot of work.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def max_score_after_split(string_to_split: str) -> int:
all_ones_count = 0
for character in string_to_split:
if character == '1':
all_ones_count += 1
left_zeros_count = 0
maximum_score = 0
for i in range(len(string_to_split) - 1):
# Update zeros count for left substring.
if string_to_split[i] == '0':
left_zeros_count += 1
# Update ones count for right substring.
if string_to_split[i] == '1':
all_ones_count -= 1
# Calculate and update maximum score.
current_score = left_zeros_count + all_ones_count
# Keep track of the maximum score seen so far
if current_score > maximum_score:
maximum_score = current_score
return maximum_score| Case | How to Handle |
|---|---|
| Null or empty string input | Return 0 immediately as no split is possible. |
| String of length 1 | Return 0 immediately as no split is possible. |
| String containing only '0' characters | The maximum score will be length - 1, calculated correctly by counting zeros on the left and ones on the right. |
| String containing only '1' characters | The maximum score will be 0, calculated correctly as there are no zeros on the left. |
| String with equal distribution of '0' and '1' | The algorithm correctly iterates to find the optimal split point maximizing the sum of zeros on the left and ones on the right. |
| Very long string (close to maximum allowed string length) | The linear time complexity (O(n)) of the prefix sum and iteration should scale reasonably well. |
| String with leading or trailing zeros | The algorithm correctly counts zeros from the left and ones from the right, regardless of their position. |
| Integer overflow when calculating left and right counts | Using integers for left and right counts is sufficient as string length is constrained by problem description, preventing integer overflow. |