You are given a 0-indexed string expression of the form "<num1>+<num2>" where <num1> and <num2> represent positive integers.
Add a pair of parentheses to expression such that after the addition of parentheses, expression is a valid mathematical expression and evaluates to the smallest possible value. The left parenthesis must be added to the left of '+' and the right parenthesis must be added to the right of '+'.
Return expression after adding a pair of parentheses such that expression evaluates to the smallest possible value. If there are multiple answers that yield the same result, return any of them.
The input has been generated such that the original value of expression, and the value of expression after adding any pair of parentheses that meets the requirements fits within a signed 32-bit integer.
Example 1:
Input: expression = "247+38" Output: "2(47+38)" Explanation: Theexpressionevaluates to 2 * (47 + 38) = 2 * 85 = 170. Note that "2(4)7+38" is invalid because the right parenthesis must be to the right of the'+'. It can be shown that 170 is the smallest possible value.
Example 2:
Input: expression = "12+34" Output: "1(2+3)4" Explanation: The expression evaluates to 1 * (2 + 3) * 4 = 1 * 5 * 4 = 20.
Example 3:
Input: expression = "999+999"
Output: "(999+999)"
Explanation: The expression evaluates to 999 + 999 = 1998.
Constraints:
3 <= expression.length <= 10expression consists of digits from '1' to '9' and '+'.expression starts and ends with digits.expression contains exactly one '+'.expression, and the value of expression after adding any pair of parentheses that meets the requirements fits within a signed 32-bit integer.When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force strategy explores every single possible way to add parentheses to the expression. It's like trying every combination and checking which one gives you the smallest final number. We'll go through each combination, calculate the result, and keep track of the best one.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def minimize_result(expression):
minimum_result = float('inf')
best_expression = ""
plus_index = expression.find('+')
# Iterate through all possible positions for the left parenthesis
for left_index in range(plus_index):
# Iterate through all possible positions for the right parenthesis
for right_index in range(plus_index + 1, len(expression) + 1):
# Extract the parts of the expression
left_part = expression[:left_index]
inside_part = expression[left_index:right_index]
right_part = expression[right_index:]
# Evaluate the expression within the parentheses
inside_numbers = inside_part.split('+')
inside_result = int(inside_numbers[0]) + int(inside_numbers[1])
# Handle multiplication for the left and right parts
left_value = 1
if left_part:
left_value = int(left_part)
right_value = 1
if right_part:
right_value = int(right_part)
current_result = left_value * inside_result * right_value
# Update the minimum result and best expression if needed
if current_result < minimum_result:
minimum_result = current_result
best_expression = left_part + '(' + inside_part + ')' + right_part
return best_expressionThe key to solving this problem efficiently is realizing we don't need to check every single place we could put the parentheses. We can focus on strategically placing the opening and closing parentheses to minimize the result of the expression.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def minimize_result(expression):
addition_index = expression.find('+')
minimum_result = float('inf')
best_expression = ""
# Try all possible left parenthesis placements
for left_parenthesis_index in range(addition_index):
#Try all possible right parenthesis placements
for right_parenthesis_index in range(addition_index + 1, len(expression) + 1):
current_expression = (
expression[:left_parenthesis_index]
+ '('
+ expression[left_parenthesis_index:right_parenthesis_index]
+ ')'
+ expression[right_parenthesis_index:]
)
# Evaluate the expression with parentheses
left_operand_string = current_expression[:left_parenthesis_index]
parenthesized_expression = current_expression[left_parenthesis_index:right_parenthesis_index+2]
right_operand_string = current_expression[right_parenthesis_index+2:]
plus_index_local = parenthesized_expression.find('+')
first_number_string = parenthesized_expression[1:plus_index_local]
second_number_string = parenthesized_expression[plus_index_local+1:-1]
first_number = int(first_number_string)
second_number = int(second_number_string)
parenthesized_result = first_number + second_number
# Handle empty strings for multiplication to work
left_operand = int(left_operand_string) if left_operand_string else 1
right_operand = int(right_operand_string) if right_operand_string else 1
current_result = left_operand * parenthesized_result * right_operand
# Track the expression for minimum result
if current_result < minimum_result:
# Need to update best found expression.
minimum_result = current_result
best_expression = (
expression[:left_parenthesis_index]
+ '('
+ expression[left_parenthesis_index:right_parenthesis_index]
+ ')'
+ expression[right_parenthesis_index:]
)
return best_expression| Case | How to Handle |
|---|---|
| Null or empty input string | Return an empty string or throw an IllegalArgumentException as there is no expression to process. |
| Input string does not contain a '+' operator. | Return the original string, or throw an IllegalArgumentException as the input doesn't conform to the expected format. |
| Input string contains non-numeric characters other than '+'. | Filter non-numeric chars except '+' or throw an IllegalArgumentException for invalid input. |
| Integer overflow during multiplication or addition. | Use long data types for intermediate calculations or check for overflow before performing operations. |
| Input string contains leading zeros in the numbers. | Remove leading zeros before parsing the numbers to ensure correct arithmetic. |
| Multiple pairs of parentheses result in the same minimum value | Return the lexicographically smallest string among those with the minimum value; any minimal solution is acceptable as long as consistent. |
| The numbers in the string are very large (close to the maximum integer value). | Use long data types for calculations and compare to LONG_MAX/MIN before casting to prevent overflow. |
| String contains multiple '+' operators, or no number between the '+' operators. | Return empty string, throw error, or consider only the first valid 'number1 + number2' pattern. |