You are given a string s
.
You can perform the following process on s
any number of times:
i
in the string such that there is at least one character to the left of index i
that is equal to s[i]
, and at least one character to the right that is also equal to s[i]
.s[i]
located to the left of i
.s[i]
located to the right of i
.Return the minimum length of the final string s
that you can achieve.
Example 1:
Input: s = "abaacbcbb"
Output: 5
Explanation:
We do the following operations:
s = "bacbcbb"
.s = "acbcb"
.Example 2:
Input: s = "aa"
Output: 2
Explanation:
We cannot perform any operations, so we return the length of the original string.
Constraints:
1 <= s.length <= 2 * 105
s
consists only of lowercase English letters.When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force approach involves trying out every possible sequence of operations on the string. We want to find the shortest possible length of the string after applying our operations by exploring all potential paths.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def minimum_length_brute_force(input_string):
shortest_length = len(input_string)
def solve(current_string):
nonlocal shortest_length
shortest_length = min(shortest_length, len(current_string))
found_reduction = False
for index in range(len(current_string) - 1):
pair = current_string[index:index + 2]
if pair in ['AB', 'BA', 'CD', 'DC']:
found_reduction = True
# Remove the pair and explore the new string
new_string = current_string[:index] + current_string[index + 2:]
solve(new_string)
# Optimization: if a path has already reached a length below shortest_length, stop
if len(current_string) >= shortest_length:
return
# Base case: If no reductions possible, the path terminates.
if not found_reduction:
return
# Initiate the recursive calls to explore all possible paths
solve(input_string)
return shortest_length
The key idea is to realize that the problem boils down to counting occurrences of characters. If the count of 'A' and 'B' are the same, we can eliminate the entire string; otherwise, only the remaining character count matters. We focus on efficiently determining this difference without directly manipulating the string repeatedly.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def min_length(input_string):
a_count = 0
b_count = 0
for char in input_string:
if char == 'A':
a_count += 1
else:
b_count += 1
# If counts are equal, the string can be fully reduced.
if a_count == b_count:
return 0
# Only the difference in counts will remain.
return abs(a_count - b_count)
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Null or empty string input | Return 0 as there are no operations possible and the string length is 0. |
String of length 1 | Return 1, as no operations are possible with a single character. |
String containing only 'A's or only 'B's | The string length remains unchanged as no 'AB' or 'BA' pairs can be found, return the initial length. |
String with alternating 'A's and 'B's of even length | The string will be reduced to empty string (length 0) after successive operations, return 0. |
String with maximum possible length (e.g., 10^5) | Ensure the algorithm has O(n) time complexity or better to avoid timeouts, potentially using a stack-based approach. |
String with a very long sequence of 'A's followed by a 'B' or vice versa | A stack-based approach efficiently handles consecutive identical characters. |
Language-specific stack overflow with recursive solutions | Avoid recursive solutions and opt for iterative approaches using stacks or similar data structures. |
Very large strings and memory constraints | If memory is a serious constraint, consider processing the string in chunks or using an in-place modification technique if permissible by the problem description, carefully handling index manipulations. |