You are given an integer array nums
where the ith
bag contains nums[i]
balls. You are also given an integer maxOperations
.
You can perform the following operation at most maxOperations
times:
5
balls can become two new bags of 1
and 4
balls, or two new bags of 2
and 3
balls.Your penalty is the maximum number of balls in a bag. You want to minimize your penalty after the operations.
Return the minimum possible penalty after performing the operations.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [9], maxOperations = 2 Output: 3 Explanation: - Divide the bag with 9 balls into two bags of sizes 6 and 3. [9] -> [6,3]. - Divide the bag with 6 balls into two bags of sizes 3 and 3. [6,3] -> [3,3,3]. The bag with the most number of balls has 3 balls, so your penalty is 3 and you should return 3.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [2,4,8,2], maxOperations = 4 Output: 2 Explanation: - Divide the bag with 8 balls into two bags of sizes 4 and 4. [2,4,8,2] -> [2,4,4,4,2]. - Divide the bag with 4 balls into two bags of sizes 2 and 2. [2,4,4,4,2] -> [2,2,2,4,4,2]. - Divide the bag with 4 balls into two bags of sizes 2 and 2. [2,2,2,4,4,2] -> [2,2,2,2,2,4,2]. - Divide the bag with 4 balls into two bags of sizes 2 and 2. [2,2,2,2,2,4,2] -> [2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2]. The bag with the most number of balls has 2 balls, so your penalty is 2, and you should return 2.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 105
1 <= maxOperations, nums[i] <= 109
When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force way to find the minimum limit is to try every possible limit value. For each potential limit, we check if we can split all the bags such that no part is larger than the limit.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def minimum_limit_of_balls_in_bag_brute_force(bags, max_operations):
maximum_bag_size = max(bags)
minimum_possible_limit = 1
best_possible_limit = maximum_bag_size
# Iterate through all possible limits
for current_limit in range(minimum_possible_limit, maximum_bag_size + 1):
total_operations_needed = 0
# Calculate required operations for current limit
for bag_size in bags:
total_operations_needed += (bag_size - 1) // current_limit
# Check if current limit is feasible
if total_operations_needed <= max_operations:
# If it is feasible, update best limit
best_possible_limit = current_limit
# We can stop here and return
# because we are going from min to max
return best_possible_limit
return best_possible_limit
The fastest way to find the smallest possible maximum bag size is to use a process of intelligent guessing and checking. We repeatedly guess a potential maximum size, then quickly check if it's possible to split all the bags so none are bigger than that guess. We use the results of our checks to refine our guesses to converge on the smallest possible maximum.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def minimum_size(nums, max_operations):
left = 1
right = max(nums)
while left < right:
mid = (left + right) // 2
operations_needed = 0
for num in nums:
operations_needed += (num - 1) // mid
# Check if the current mid is feasible.
if operations_needed <= max_operations:
right = mid
else:
left = mid + 1
# Left and right converge to the minimum size.
return left
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Empty input array (nums is null or empty) | Return 0 immediately as there are no bags to operate on, indicating an edge case where no balls exist. |
maxOperations is 0 | Return the maximum element in nums as no operations can be performed, so the largest bag remains unchanged. |
nums contains only one element | Binary search needs a lower bound of 1; if maxOperations is greater than 0, return 1; otherwise, return the single element. |
All elements in nums are the same. | Binary search will still converge to a result, but the number of operations will either be 0 (if a small enough penalty is chosen) or a larger number if it needs to be reduced. |
Large values in nums potentially causing integer overflow during calculations. | Use long data type or appropriate bounds checking within the cost function to prevent overflow and ensure accuracy. |
maxOperations is a very large number, allowing for aggressive splitting. | The binary search should converge to a minimum limit even with very large maxOperations efficiently. |
A bag already has a small number of balls close to the potentially minimum maximum | The binary search should correctly find the lower bound that balances operation usage and maximum ball count. |
Input array contains large number of bags with widely varying counts | The binary search approach will still efficiently narrow down the optimal minimum limit, regardless of the distribution. |