You are given an integer array nums and an integer k. You may partition nums into one or more subsequences such that each element in nums appears in exactly one of the subsequences.
Return the minimum number of subsequences needed such that the difference between the maximum and minimum values in each subsequence is at most k.
A subsequence is a sequence that can be derived from another sequence by deleting some or no elements without changing the order of the remaining elements.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [3,6,1,2,5], k = 2 Output: 2 Explanation: We can partition nums into the two subsequences [3,1,2] and [6,5]. The difference between the maximum and minimum value in the first subsequence is 3 - 1 = 2. The difference between the maximum and minimum value in the second subsequence is 6 - 5 = 1. Since two subsequences were created, we return 2. It can be shown that 2 is the minimum number of subsequences needed.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1,2,3], k = 1 Output: 2 Explanation: We can partition nums into the two subsequences [1,2] and [3]. The difference between the maximum and minimum value in the first subsequence is 2 - 1 = 1. The difference between the maximum and minimum value in the second subsequence is 3 - 3 = 0. Since two subsequences were created, we return 2. Note that another optimal solution is to partition nums into the two subsequences [1] and [2,3].
Example 3:
Input: nums = [2,2,4,5], k = 0 Output: 3 Explanation: We can partition nums into the three subsequences [2,2], [4], and [5]. The difference between the maximum and minimum value in the first subsequences is 2 - 2 = 0. The difference between the maximum and minimum value in the second subsequences is 4 - 4 = 0. The difference between the maximum and minimum value in the third subsequences is 5 - 5 = 0. Since three subsequences were created, we return 3. It can be shown that 3 is the minimum number of subsequences needed.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 1050 <= nums[i] <= 1050 <= k <= 105When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force method for this problem involves checking absolutely every possible way to split the numbers into groups. We want to find at least one split where, within each group, the biggest and smallest numbers are no more than a set amount apart. If no group exceeds that threshold, that partitioning is a candidate.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def can_partition_brute_force(numbers, max_difference):
number_count = len(numbers)
# Iterate through all possible numbers of groups
for group_count in range(1, number_count + 1):
# Iterate through all possible combinations of groups
for combination in generate_combinations(numbers, group_count):
is_valid_partition = True
# Check each group to ensure it satisfies the difference requirement.
for group in combination:
if len(group) > 0:
maximum_value = max(group)
minimum_value = min(group)
if maximum_value - minimum_value > max_difference:
is_valid_partition = False
break
# If the current partition is valid, return true
if is_valid_partition:
return True
return False
def generate_combinations(numbers, group_count):
if group_count == 1:
yield [numbers]
return
if len(numbers) == 0 or group_count <= 0:
yield []
return
for i in range(1, len(numbers) + 1):
first_group = numbers[:i]
for rest_groups in generate_combinations(numbers[i:], group_count - 1):
yield [first_group] + rest_groupsTo partition the array most efficiently, we sort the array first. Then, we create partitions greedily. The key is to add elements to a partition as long as the difference between the largest and smallest element in that partition remains less than or equal to K.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def partition_array(numbers, max_difference):
numbers.sort()
partitions_count = 0
start_index = 0
# Iterate through the sorted array
while start_index < len(numbers):
partitions_count += 1
current_partition_min = numbers[start_index]
current_index = start_index + 1
# Greedily add elements to the current partition
while current_index < len(numbers):
# Check if the new number exceeds max difference
if numbers[current_index] - current_partition_min <= max_difference:
current_index += 1
else:
break
# Start a new partition from the next element
start_index = current_index
return partitions_count| Case | How to Handle |
|---|---|
| Null or empty input array | Return an empty list or throw an IllegalArgumentException as appropriate to signal invalid input. |
| Input array with only one element | Return a list containing the single element since a single element array is trivially partitioned. |
| Array with all identical elements and K is zero | The original array is already partitioned, so return a list containing the original array. |
| Array with all identical elements and K is non-zero | Return a list containing the original array as any partition will satisfy the condition. |
| Large input array with numbers close to Integer.MAX_VALUE and Integer.MIN_VALUE | Sorting the array might cause integer overflow when calculating differences, so use long to prevent overflow. |
| Array is already sorted and satisfies the condition | The algorithm should efficiently process this case, ideally without unnecessary operations, by returning the initial array as a single partition. |
| Array with negative numbers, zeros, and positive numbers | The solution needs to correctly handle the signed differences by taking absolute values or sorting to handle properly. |
| No possible partition exists given the input array and K | The algorithm should return the original array as a single partition indicating that no valid partition was found |