You are given two arrays of integers, boxes and warehouse, representing the height of some boxes of unit width and the heights of the available spaces in a warehouse. The warehouse's width is the length of the warehouse array.
You are asked to put the boxes into the warehouse such that each box is placed vertically into a space of the warehouse. Boxes can be rearranged arbitrarily.
Return the maximum number of boxes that can be placed in the warehouse.
Note: Since the warehouse may have more spaces than the number of boxes, for an optimal solution, you should rearrange the spaces such that the first spaces in the warehouse have the lowest height.
Example 1:
Input: boxes = [4,3,4,1], warehouse = [5,3,3,4,1] Output: 3 Explanation: We can first reorder the warehouse to [1,3,3,4,5]. Then we can place the boxes as follows: boxes[3] -> warehouse[0] boxes[1] -> warehouse[1] boxes[0] -> warehouse[3]
Example 2:
Input: boxes = [1,2,2,3,4], warehouse = [3,4,1,2] Output: 4 Explanation: We can first reorder the warehouse to [1,2,3,4]. Then we can place the boxes as follows: boxes[0] -> warehouse[0] boxes[1] -> warehouse[1] boxes[2] -> warehouse[2] boxes[3] -> warehouse[3]
Example 3:
Input: boxes = [1,2,3], warehouse = [1,2,3,4] Output: 3 Explanation: We can place all the boxes in the warehouse.
Constraints:
n == boxes.lengthm == warehouse.length1 <= n <= m <= 1051 <= boxes[i], warehouse[i] <= 105When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force method to fit boxes into warehouses involves testing every possible combination of boxes and warehouse pairings. We essentially try placing each box in every possible warehouse and see if it fits, repeating this process for all boxes until we find a valid arrangement or exhaust all possibilities. This method guarantees finding a solution if one exists, but it can be quite inefficient.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def put_boxes_into_warehouse_brute_force(boxes, warehouses):
from itertools import permutations
best_arrangement = None
for box_permutation in permutations(boxes):
for i in range(2**(len(boxes) - 1) if len(boxes) > 0 else 1):
warehouse_arrangement = []
current_warehouse = []
warehouse_index = 0
binary_representation = bin(i)[2:].zfill(len(boxes) - 1)
for box_index in range(len(box_permutation)):
current_warehouse.append(box_permutation[box_index])
if box_index < len(box_permutation) - 1 and binary_representation[box_index] == '1':
warehouse_arrangement.append(current_warehouse)
current_warehouse = []
warehouse_index += 1
warehouse_arrangement.append(current_warehouse)
# Validate if boxes fit the warehouses.
valid_arrangement = True
for warehouse_index, boxes_in_warehouse in enumerate(warehouse_arrangement):
warehouse_size = warehouses[warehouse_index] if warehouse_index < len(warehouses) else 0
for box_size in boxes_in_warehouse:
if box_size > warehouse_size:
valid_arrangement = False
break
if not valid_arrangement:
break
if valid_arrangement:
# Compare the number of used warehouses.
num_warehouses_used = len(warehouse_arrangement)
if best_arrangement is None or num_warehouses_used < len(best_arrangement):
best_arrangement = warehouse_arrangement
if best_arrangement:
return len(best_arrangement)
else:
return -1The problem is about fitting boxes of different sizes into warehouses of different sizes to maximize the number of boxes you can fit. The core idea is to sort both boxes and warehouses and then try to match them in a clever way using two pointers to avoid unnecessary comparisons.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def put_boxes_into_warehouse_ii(boxes, warehouses):
boxes.sort()
warehouses.sort()
box_index = 0
warehouse_index = len(warehouses) - 1
boxes_placed = 0
# Iterate from the largest warehouse to smallest.
while warehouse_index >= 0 and box_index < len(boxes):
# Find if the current smallest box fits.
if boxes[box_index] <= warehouses[warehouse_index]:
boxes_placed += 1
box_index += 1
warehouse_index -= 1
else:
# Go to the next smallest warehouse.
warehouse_index -= 1
return boxes_placed| Case | How to Handle |
|---|---|
| Empty boxes or warehouses array | Return 0 immediately as no boxes can be placed in an empty warehouse. |
| Boxes array contains very large box sizes | Ensure the data type used for box and warehouse sizes (e.g., int, long) can accommodate the maximum possible size to prevent overflow or incorrect comparisons. |
| Warehouses array contains very small warehouse sizes | The solution should correctly handle warehouses that are too small to fit any box, likely resulting in those warehouses being skipped during the matching process. |
| No warehouse is big enough for any box | The algorithm should return 0 since no boxes can be placed. |
| All boxes are identical in size | Sorting can be skipped if all warehouse sizes are the same to avoid unnecessary operations. |
| All warehouses are identical in size | Sorting of boxes and assigning to each warehouse sequentially can address this case. |
| Boxes are already sorted (best case scenario) | The algorithm should be efficient even if the boxes or warehouses are already sorted, avoiding unnecessary sorting operations if possible, or taking advantage of it. |
| Integer overflow during calculations of space remaining or comparison of large sizes | Use appropriate data types (e.g., long) to avoid integer overflow during calculations when dealing with large box or warehouse sizes. |