Given a string representing arbitrarily nested ternary expressions, evaluate the expression and return the result.
You can always assume that the given expression is valid and only consists of digits 0-9, ?, :, T and F (T and F represent True and False respectively).
Note:
Example 1:
Input: "T?2:3" Output: "2" Explanation: If true, result is 2; otherwise result is 3.
Example 2:
Input: "F?1:T?4:5" Output: "4" Explanation: The conditional expressions group right-to-left. Using parenthesis, the input is parsed as: "F?1:(T?4:5)" --> "F?1:4" --> "4".
Example 3:
Input: "T?T?F:5:3" Output: "F" Explanation: The conditional expressions group right-to-left. Using parenthesis, the input is parsed as: "T?(T?F:5):3" --> "T?F:3" --> "F".
When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force way to evaluate a ternary expression is to explore every possible interpretation. Think of it as trying every combination of true and false answers to the conditions until we find one that fits. We keep simplifying the expression step by step until we arrive at a single value.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def solve_ternary_brute_force(expression):
results = []
def evaluate(current_expression):
if len(current_expression) == 1:
results.append(current_expression)
return
# Find the first '?' to identify a ternary operation.
question_mark_index = current_expression.find('?')
if question_mark_index == -1:
results.append(current_expression)
return
condition = current_expression[:question_mark_index]
# Determine the indices of the true and false parts
colon_index = current_expression.find(':')
true_expression = current_expression[question_mark_index + 1:colon_index]
false_expression = current_expression[colon_index + 1:]
# Explore the 'true' branch.
evaluate(true_expression)
# Explore the 'false' branch.
evaluate(false_expression)
evaluate(expression)
#Return the first result found from all possible paths
return results[0]The most efficient way to parse a ternary expression is to work from right to left using a special data structure. This approach allows us to solve smaller parts of the expression first and combine them to solve the bigger expression without redundant calculations.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def ternary_expression_parser(expression):
stack = []
index = len(expression) - 1
while index >= 0:
character = expression[index]
if character.isalnum():
stack.append(character)
elif character == '?':
# Found a ternary operation, evaluate it.
false_value = stack.pop()
true_value = stack.pop()
index -= 1 # Skip the ':' character
condition = stack.pop()
# Evaluate the condition and push result.
if condition != '0':
stack.append(true_value)
else:
stack.append(false_value)
index -= 1
# The final result is left on the stack.
return stack[0]| Case | How to Handle |
|---|---|
| Null or empty input string | Return an empty string or throw an IllegalArgumentException, depending on requirements, to indicate invalid input. |
| Single character input (e.g., 'T', '1') | Return the single character as it is already evaluated. |
| Invalid characters in the input (e.g., 'A', '$') | Throw an IllegalArgumentException to indicate invalid ternary expression format. |
| Unbalanced '?' and ':' operators (e.g., 'T?1') | Throw an IllegalArgumentException because the ternary expression is incomplete and cannot be evaluated. |
| Input string with only 'T' and '?' (e.g., 'T?T?1:0') | The algorithm should correctly evaluate based on the 'T' values, selecting the correct branches recursively. |
| Deeply nested expressions causing stack overflow with a recursive solution | Consider using an iterative approach with a stack data structure to prevent stack overflow errors for very large expressions. |
| Leading or trailing whitespace in input | Trim the input string before processing to avoid unexpected behavior. |
| Large numerical values in the ternary expression | The solution should handle large digits (as string) without causing integer overflow during processing, as we return a string. |