Given an integer array nums
and a positive integer k
, return the most competitive subsequence of nums
of size k
.
An array's subsequence is a resulting sequence obtained by erasing some (possibly zero) elements from the array.
We define that a subsequence a
is more competitive than a subsequence b
(of the same length) if in the first position where a
and b
differ, subsequence a
has a number less than the corresponding number in b
. For example, [1,3,4]
is more competitive than [1,3,5]
because the first position they differ is at the final number, and 4
is less than 5
.
For example:
nums = [3, 5, 2, 6], k = 2
. The most competitive subsequence is [2, 6]
.nums = [2, 4, 3, 3, 5, 4, 9, 6], k = 4
. The most competitive subsequence is [2, 3, 3, 4]
.Can you implement a function to find the most competitive subsequence?
When you get asked this question in a real-life environment, it will often be ambiguous (especially at FAANG). Make sure to ask these questions in that case:
The brute force approach is like trying every single possible combination to find the best one. We essentially go through all the subsequences and pick the 'most competitive' one based on the problem's definition.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def find_most_competitive_subsequence_brute_force(numbers, subsequence_length):
most_competitive_subsequence = []
# Generate all possible subsequences
for i in range(1 << len(numbers)):
current_subsequence = []
for j in range(len(numbers)):
if (i >> j) & 1:
current_subsequence.append(numbers[j])
# Only consider subsequences of correct length
if len(current_subsequence) == subsequence_length:
# First subsequence of correct length initializes
if not most_competitive_subsequence:
most_competitive_subsequence = current_subsequence
else:
# Compare current to the most competitive so far
for index in range(subsequence_length):
if current_subsequence[index] < most_competitive_subsequence[index]:
most_competitive_subsequence = current_subsequence
break
#If current subsequence is not better, move on
elif current_subsequence[index] > most_competitive_subsequence[index]:
break
return most_competitive_subsequence
To find the most competitive subsequence, imagine you're building the subsequence one element at a time, always picking the smallest available number while ensuring you have enough numbers left to complete the subsequence. We use a special data structure that lets us quickly identify and remove larger, less competitive numbers that are no longer needed.
Here's how the algorithm would work step-by-step:
def find_most_competitive_subsequence(numbers, subsequence_length):
stack = []
numbers_to_remove = len(numbers) - subsequence_length
for i, number in enumerate(numbers):
# Maintain the stack to ensure competitiveness.
while stack and number < stack[-1] and numbers_to_remove > 0:
stack.pop()
numbers_to_remove -= 1
# Only add if there's space.
if len(stack) < subsequence_length:
stack.append(number)
# Ensure correct length if removals were insufficient.
while numbers_to_remove > 0 and stack:
stack.pop()
numbers_to_remove -= 1
return stack
Case | How to Handle |
---|---|
Empty input array nums or k <= 0 | Return an empty array if nums is empty or k is non-positive. |
k is equal to the length of nums | Return the original nums array as the most competitive subsequence. |
nums contains only identical values | The subsequence will consist of the first k identical values. |
nums is sorted in descending order | The subsequence will consist of the first k elements of the sorted array. |
nums contains negative and positive numbers | The algorithm should handle both positive and negative numbers correctly by comparing their values. |
Large input array size with small k (k << len(nums)) | Use a stack-based approach to maintain the potential subsequence to achieve O(N) time complexity. |
Input array contains very large numbers close to integer limits | Ensure that comparisons don't cause integer overflow and the language's integer comparison handles large numbers correctly. |
Multiple equally competitive subsequences exist | The algorithm inherently finds the lexicographically smallest among equally competitive subsequences due to its left-to-right processing. |