Very good company to work for with good allowances. The projects are interesting, and there is a WFH option.
Recruited as an automation resource, but you will be burdened with a lot of manual testing tasks, and they will say that you need to do everything. They will show others who work in manual testing and say, "Aren't they not humans? They are working, right? So you need to work on manual testing." Because of this, I felt like I was going backward. Poor work allocation and treatment from the manager.
Please assign tasks based on skillset.
I did get the offer, but I had two rounds of screening. The first round was an online technical assessment, which had a list of multiple-choice questions. The second was a video call for a technical assessment. Most of the questions were from MVC
Went well: initial phone or video interviews, and potentially in-person interviews to assess candidates' qualifications and suitability for a role, culminating in a job offer or rejection. Inquire About Next Steps: Politely ask about the timeline fo
Good, two rounds of technical and one HR, which is good. In the first round, I was asked a basic Java-related question. In the second round, I received Spring Boot microservices architecture-related questions.
I did get the offer, but I had two rounds of screening. The first round was an online technical assessment, which had a list of multiple-choice questions. The second was a video call for a technical assessment. Most of the questions were from MVC
Went well: initial phone or video interviews, and potentially in-person interviews to assess candidates' qualifications and suitability for a role, culminating in a job offer or rejection. Inquire About Next Steps: Politely ask about the timeline fo
Good, two rounds of technical and one HR, which is good. In the first round, I was asked a basic Java-related question. In the second round, I received Spring Boot microservices architecture-related questions.