Good hikes. Recognition. Work-life balance. Innovation.
Hectic sometimes. Extra pressure.
No advice
The panel is good, not bad. They asked good questions and answered well, but timing is the problem. The questions were lengthy but answerable. It was quite good, not bad. I was selected later and felt bad.
Two technical rounds followed by an HR round. The technical rounds were completely on the technology worked in, and in-depth questions were asked on the second technical round after qualifying the first. The first-round interviewer had 15 years of ex
Aptitude and technical rounds will be conducted before getting in. If well prepared, one can crack the interview, but it requires strong knowledge of their basics and aptitude. They mainly focus on communication skills and how fluent our English is.
The panel is good, not bad. They asked good questions and answered well, but timing is the problem. The questions were lengthy but answerable. It was quite good, not bad. I was selected later and felt bad.
Two technical rounds followed by an HR round. The technical rounds were completely on the technology worked in, and in-depth questions were asked on the second technical round after qualifying the first. The first-round interviewer had 15 years of ex
Aptitude and technical rounds will be conducted before getting in. If well prepared, one can crack the interview, but it requires strong knowledge of their basics and aptitude. They mainly focus on communication skills and how fluent our English is.