Depending on position and location, salaries range from slightly to moderately under industry standards.
As an entry-level employee, you have little say in your initial projects, which means you can be placed in roles and technologies that have nothing to do with your ultimate career objectives. While this would be acceptable and maybe even desirable for someone starting out wishing to learn more, working in a particular field or role type tends to cement you into that field in the eyes of further projects, leading to a situation where you can get sidetracked and then stuck.
Work-life balance can be slightly harsh on some projects. This would be fine given that overtime is paid and the company is upfront about this inevitability, but management also hints very strongly that they disapprove of charging overtime. A fellow worker was asked to consider how long their lunch break was, if they got up for water, or how long they went to the bathroom (seriously?) before trying to bill overtime hours that you can be sure they actually worked. Either make strides to improve work-life balance and discourage overtime, or accept that you are going to get charged as is. It's not like the standard salary ACC pays is exorbitantly high to begin with.
Try to align employees, especially new hires who will need real-world testing to solidify their training of choice, with actual experience in their field and their career aims. If projects dictate that they be shifted elsewhere out of necessity, don't simply forget; make a point to bring them back to their original track. After all, they are probably strongest in it and will produce better work for you there anyway.
It was good and easy. Mostly, the interview was not technical. Questions were like: * Who is your inspiration? * What is your strength? * What is your weakness? * What is your project? * Hobbies? * What is your family background? * What is your qua
Very easy interview process, and all HR used to support on priority. They used to track the candidate for onboarding, etc. All emails were very specific, and we could understand the emails from them. We could ask anything to the person who was assign
Interview was very annoying. It was way too long, with multiple rounds of people who do not want to be doing it or hate their life. Never seen that before.
It was good and easy. Mostly, the interview was not technical. Questions were like: * Who is your inspiration? * What is your strength? * What is your weakness? * What is your project? * Hobbies? * What is your family background? * What is your qua
Very easy interview process, and all HR used to support on priority. They used to track the candidate for onboarding, etc. All emails were very specific, and we could understand the emails from them. We could ask anything to the person who was assign
Interview was very annoying. It was way too long, with multiple rounds of people who do not want to be doing it or hate their life. Never seen that before.