Some QEs get to do interesting work.
Not all QEs get good work. Usually, they get boring manual testing and very repetitive work, which is not challenging at all. This is probably a bad job to be stuck in.
Performance and appraisals are biased towards developers. As stated, QEs don't get to do great work, and hence this reflects in their appraisals. QEs are stuck with boring things to do, and all their time is lost there.
There is a huge divide between QEs and DEVs. The devs have a condescending attitude towards the QEs.
Better pay and more respect for QEs
1. Written (Same set circulating from a long time; questions can be found directly on the internet.) 2. Interview 1: Based on my resume and general logic ability-related programs. 3. Interview 2: Based on understanding of the basics of computing
It was a video conference interview. First of all, the interviewer was one hour late. Then, they did not ask for lunch and made me sit for four hours, while the second round happened after a gap of another hour.
There were two rounds for the on-campus selection. The first was an online test round. I received one coding question, which was easy/medium, and there were some MCQs related to aptitude. I was shortlisted for the next interview round.
1. Written (Same set circulating from a long time; questions can be found directly on the internet.) 2. Interview 1: Based on my resume and general logic ability-related programs. 3. Interview 2: Based on understanding of the basics of computing
It was a video conference interview. First of all, the interviewer was one hour late. Then, they did not ask for lunch and made me sit for four hours, while the second round happened after a gap of another hour.
There were two rounds for the on-campus selection. The first was an online test round. I received one coding question, which was easy/medium, and there were some MCQs related to aptitude. I was shortlisted for the next interview round.