I applied through a recruiter.
I went through two interviews: the introductory interview with two engineers, and a take-home task interview.
The first interview was great, and I really enjoyed it. The interviewers were friendly, prepared, and easy to talk with. But I had the opposite feeling about the second interview, which was the take-home task. The task wasn't a small one that could be done in a couple of hours, so I ended up spending around 25 hours working on it to meet all the requirements and to have a well-defined architecture that could be easily tested, maintained, and scaled with future features, as was mentioned in the project description. Still, unfortunately, I got a rejection.
Most of the feedback, from my point of view, was opinionated, based on the reviewer's opinions. Two points of the feedback I agree with them, and they were minor. I think the reviewer was aiming to review a task that met his opinions 100%.
What I didn't understand was that there should have been another meeting mainly to discuss the task and challenge my solutions. If there were an interview like this, why did I need to submit a task that hit the 100% mark?
I didn't feel that Adyen respected my personal time that I spent on the task to get it to the best shape possible, regarding my limited free time during the workdays. They also didn't give me a chance to prove my point of view regarding my solution and the opinions behind the tech decisions.
Introduction: Interview mainly talking about Adyen Formula.
Take-home task that takes around 20 hours to get it into a good shape.
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Adyen Interview for Software Developer role in Netherlands.
Adyen's interview process for their Interview for Software Developer roles in Netherlands is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Adyen's Interview for Software Developer interview process in Netherlands.