Brand name on your resume is good.
But you only need to stay for a year to make it stick.
I would only sign Amazon if you can't get any other similar offer in terms of prestige, as the resume boost is excellent.
It's just not worth the effort working at Amazon, especially since the stock growth has fizzled out. Compensation is not competitive, but WLB is far worse than the rest of FAANG. Company politics is a huge deal, and they are openly accepting of toxic employees as long as they can run the show. Stay away if you can. Even if you do accept, just use them as a springboard for the next opportunity.
Customer obsession comes at the cost of being the world's best employer. You have to figure out how to make both of them work together.
Managers should be held to strict moral standards on top of just performance.
My first interview wasn't very smooth, as the interviewer didn't show up. However, they were professional and scheduled another interview for me. I was given ample preparation time, and they informed me of the hints and policies to remember.
Round 1 (HackerEarth Round – Coding Challenge): Two questions were asked to be solved. * Based on the priority queue * Based on the map I solved both questions within 40 minutes. After a few weeks, I got a call for scheduling interview rounds. Ro
The interview was straightforward, and most questions were from current aptitude patterns, which included English and some reasoning questions. The interviewer focused on qualities such as proficiency and quick responses to questions.
My first interview wasn't very smooth, as the interviewer didn't show up. However, they were professional and scheduled another interview for me. I was given ample preparation time, and they informed me of the hints and policies to remember.
Round 1 (HackerEarth Round – Coding Challenge): Two questions were asked to be solved. * Based on the priority queue * Based on the map I solved both questions within 40 minutes. After a few weeks, I got a call for scheduling interview rounds. Ro
The interview was straightforward, and most questions were from current aptitude patterns, which included English and some reasoning questions. The interviewer focused on qualities such as proficiency and quick responses to questions.