One of the first pieces of advice I read before joining was that you have to be "self-directed," as work here can be very uncertain and you have to figure out a lot of things on your own. Some people see this as a negative. However, I believe that the unpredictability and the pressure to uniquely find a solution no one else has found can be quite empowering.
One of the leadership principles here is "Ownership," and it is one that can guide you to a very fulfilling career, where you learn new things every day for many years.
Sure, it can be intimidating and overwhelming for even very experienced technologists. But if you are clear on your purpose and career goals, and the impact you can make on others, you can be energized every day by these challenges. It's a very unique culture, and it is by no means ideal or perfect, but in the world of inventors, it's not supposed to be.
It is a large organization, and the systems of control (what some people loosely refer to as bureaucracy) will be there, as in any other large company, especially one that's part of the FANG (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Google).
How else can you responsibly manage growth?
There are positives of being largely federated (that is, teams are quite independent), and there are negatives (there can never be enough communication to have ideal coordination and avoid duplicity and optimal efficiency). But with such scale and federated independence comes the ability to experiment and solve very large problems.
Also, ambitious people can often be distracted by the wrong goals (obsessing about leveling up), but that can happen in companies large and small.
Key team leadership is critical. Although not all leaders are super efficient, there's plenty of excellent leadership that is of world-class caliber.
Not everyone can stomach these large-scale problems, and most people don't have the time discipline to not burn out in these circumstances. But if you work with awareness of these aspects of the environment, you can certainly thrive here.
As with any large organization, you have to constantly reinvent (no pun intended) yourself as leaders. This is a place that can only succeed if you continue to evolve leadership best practices.
Stay true to the LPs, push for more agility and the least amount of complacency, and constantly review your leadership as you review the data for most other personnel or project decisions. In many cases, traditional leadership processes will not be good enough here.
Continuing to grow the most adaptable leaders will ensure the evolution continues to work as it should.
It was good, but they didn't respond to me for a long time after 14 days. I asked them why, but they didn't respond back.
First round: Hiring manager screening. This covers leadership principles important for the job. Final round: Five interviews with a writing assessment. Each round covers around three leadership principles. All interviews are behavioral.
Initial phone call with a recruiter, followed by a 90-minute coding assignment. This consisted of standard LeetCode-style algorithm and data structures problems, loosely related to the specific role and easy to prepare for by using normal resources.
It was good, but they didn't respond to me for a long time after 14 days. I asked them why, but they didn't respond back.
First round: Hiring manager screening. This covers leadership principles important for the job. Final round: Five interviews with a writing assessment. Each round covers around three leadership principles. All interviews are behavioral.
Initial phone call with a recruiter, followed by a 90-minute coding assignment. This consisted of standard LeetCode-style algorithm and data structures problems, loosely related to the specific role and easy to prepare for by using normal resources.