Flexible hours and dress code (in my building anyway), and everyone treats each other as equals.
I'm a software guy, and they treat us better than most employers in Austin.
Things are largely a meritocracy, so if you have a good idea, you can make a difference regardless of rank.
AMD is big enough that you can find projects that will interest you, and managers are usually pretty good about letting you work for other teams and/or on something that you will enjoy more.
There are some serious documentation black holes (either it doesn't exist or it's old/wrong, making it hard to find the information you need to do your job).
They expect you to work hard (I know people working 70-80 hours), but aren't big sticklers for face time. Just get it done.
Things have turned around recently.
Keep it on an upward trend.
The interview process was easy to schedule and go through. Two interviews back to back. A rude interviewer who did not allow me to answer questions that he asked. Mostly a resume screening, although he did not want to hear about my experience.
One initial recruiter call followed by an interview loop. The loop consisted of two 1-hour interviews, which included technical and coding questions. I was unable to answer some questions and was subsequently rejected.
The process felt disjointed with unusual follow-up times. However, all recruiters and interviewers were very friendly. It seems the teams, rather than HR, control the timelines. Interviewers were very knowledgeable.
The interview process was easy to schedule and go through. Two interviews back to back. A rude interviewer who did not allow me to answer questions that he asked. Mostly a resume screening, although he did not want to hear about my experience.
One initial recruiter call followed by an interview loop. The loop consisted of two 1-hour interviews, which included technical and coding questions. I was unable to answer some questions and was subsequently rejected.
The process felt disjointed with unusual follow-up times. However, all recruiters and interviewers were very friendly. It seems the teams, rather than HR, control the timelines. Interviewers were very knowledgeable.