The recruiter approached me via email, possibly after I received a referral from a friend who works there.
First, there was a phone screening interview asking why I wanted to work at Apple and how my skillset fit with the job description. Then, I moved on to a one-on-one with the hiring manager. It was all behavioral questions; some I had prepared for, but others I had not.
I was a bit disappointed that I did not get the job, since I used to work there as a contractor for more than a year and understand the workflow to hit the ground running as soon as possible.
I was disappointed because they assessed us with standard and dated HR behavioral questions that are meant to be answered as scripted as possible – or, should I say, the LinkedIn version of ourselves.
Also, the behavioral questions and assessment are standardized with in-office dynamics and culture in mind, not catered for a post-pandemic world where people have been working remotely/hybrid for more than two years. Perhaps this is because they require everyone to work from the office soon? For a person who thrives working remotely, I find it mind-boggling that Apple still uses this standard HR template. I hope they find a fitting candidate for this role.
What is your leadership style?
Tell me about a time when you faced a difficult situation at work.
How was your process when working on QA?
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Apple Localization QA Tester role in Austin, Texas.
Apple's interview process for their Localization QA Tester roles in Austin, Texas is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very good feelings for Apple's Localization QA Tester interview process in Austin, Texas.