The process was quite typical for a tech company:
In terms of the difficulty, I'd say it was reasonable, and the scope of the problems was appropriate and relevant to the position I was interviewing for.
In terms of the people doing the interviews, my experience was neutral-to-negative: one was great, one was okay, and the rest were bad. In the latter category, I'm talking about being constantly interrupted (and not precisely with hints or constructive feedback; it was the type of unnecessary comments that throw you off and make you lose focus), not being offered any time to ask them questions, the interviewer being visibly distracted and taking a couple of seconds to "come back" to the real world after you ask a clarifying question, and just general standoffishness. This was a pattern I observed all the way down to the offer stage, when I technically wasn't being interviewed anymore.
Overall, I got the sense this place is intense (not a bad thing per se), but also potentially individualistic and ego-driven. A couple of people mentioned high workloads too, which may contribute to the amount of stress and burnout experienced, and in turn to creating a toxic culture. The vibes seemed off to me, though this is subjective of course. Ultimately, I decided to pass on the opportunity.
Why did you leave your past job?
The following metrics were computed from 2 interview experiences for the Applied Intuition Engineer role in United States.
Applied Intuition's interview process for their Engineer roles in the United States is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having mixed feelings for Applied Intuition's Engineer interview process in United States.