I'm still learning, but I appreciate how thoughtful things are done at this company. I never used the product before, but I love it. I like how they track progress on their corporate values. I appreciate their goals as a company and the healthy way they try to treat people.
The onboarding process, while thorough, is quite time-consuming, so a large portion of my time has been spent dealing with this. I'm starting on more program work and looking forward to that. There have been quite a few people leaving since I started, some folks who have been here a long time. I'm watching to see if this is systemic of something larger or just natural attrition within a large company.
Watch your attrition, and make sure you do thorough exit interviews and address any concerns.
Recruiter call followed by a technical screen. Then onsite. Onsite was nice and there was a break for lunch too. Overall a pretty smooth process though they did kind of lag in between the screen and onsite.
Gave a simple 90-minute interview with discussion afterwards. The question was easy, and the discussion was smooth. Have a good understanding of your code and be prepared to explain all of your design decisions.
This was a discussion about some algorithm. It was an open-ended question about how I would solve the problem, essentially a proxy for remembering graph algorithms. I didn't pass, primarily because I wasn't familiar with the specific technique for f
Recruiter call followed by a technical screen. Then onsite. Onsite was nice and there was a break for lunch too. Overall a pretty smooth process though they did kind of lag in between the screen and onsite.
Gave a simple 90-minute interview with discussion afterwards. The question was easy, and the discussion was smooth. Have a good understanding of your code and be prepared to explain all of your design decisions.
This was a discussion about some algorithm. It was an open-ended question about how I would solve the problem, essentially a proxy for remembering graph algorithms. I didn't pass, primarily because I wasn't familiar with the specific technique for f