Generous learning opportunities, multi-cultural, and open to discussion.
Not very organized, a reactive nature rather than proactive, with no clear path of growth and a very slow promotion cycle.
It was good. I met with a panel of 8 for the second stage of the interview. It was a good interview for the most part, but there was a panel member that was very tough.
A phone screening followed by a 1-hour interview with the group leader, followed by a 3-4 hour interview with different members of the team. They never got back to me after the interview, even after many weeks. I was expecting better from a company
Introduce yourself. Ask questions about your CV, for example: * What difficulties did you encounter during the project? * How did you solve them? * What did you learn in the process? * Explain the theory of the project. * How did you apply your ski
It was good. I met with a panel of 8 for the second stage of the interview. It was a good interview for the most part, but there was a panel member that was very tough.
A phone screening followed by a 1-hour interview with the group leader, followed by a 3-4 hour interview with different members of the team. They never got back to me after the interview, even after many weeks. I was expecting better from a company
Introduce yourself. Ask questions about your CV, for example: * What difficulties did you encounter during the project? * How did you solve them? * What did you learn in the process? * Explain the theory of the project. * How did you apply your ski