Can help with visa and relocation and provides some flexibility in personal time usage.
The company has overwhelmingly inefficient business processes. It has tons of legacy, unmaintainable, and untestable code without any real owner. This code is still used and is being chaotically changed, even populated with new features. There is no confidence in tests and no test coverage reports for legacy code. All of this turns development into never-ending pain. You might think that 'legacy' is something temporary here, but no – I can see that the amount of such code is only increasing.
Internal documentation is very inconsistent and often outdated.
Loyalty to management and avoidance of any disagreements are keys for career success. If you tend to understand words literally and are looking for managers you can trust, this company is a very poor choice.
The company provides very limited opportunities for self-development, especially if it is not tightly related to the roadmap of your team or does not promise a quick turnaround. The '20% time' policy has very limited application here; usually, it is required that people tackle technical debt in that time.
The interview process includes: * A written test via email * A phone interview * On-site interviews
The interview process involved a phone interview followed by five rounds of virtual on-site interviews: * 2 coding rounds * 1 value-based interview * 1 design interview * 1 hiring manager interview The questions were of easy to medium diffi
After an extensive, months-long process, I was rejected by the final hiring committee. This was very unfortunate. The process was mentally draining, and I don't believe it's a good indication of how well a candidate will perform in the role.
The interview process includes: * A written test via email * A phone interview * On-site interviews
The interview process involved a phone interview followed by five rounds of virtual on-site interviews: * 2 coding rounds * 1 value-based interview * 1 design interview * 1 hiring manager interview The questions were of easy to medium diffi
After an extensive, months-long process, I was rejected by the final hiring committee. This was very unfortunate. The process was mentally draining, and I don't believe it's a good indication of how well a candidate will perform in the role.