The interview process was pretty organized.
The overview of Benchling was non-evaluative. It was a preview of the product. This session was okay -- the engineer presenting didn't know much about what they were presenting. It was a lot of copy-and-pasting to show the software features versus how those features empower scientists to do research.
The design session was pretty straightforward. Model a schema for the product that supports versioning. This session was pretty enjoyable.
The management section asked about instances where I mentored junior engineers, senior engineers, etc. A bunch of behavioral questions. I also enjoyed this section.
I didn't move to the second day. However, the recruiter got back to me and explained what the team's expectations were and where they felt I didn't meet them. I really appreciated the follow-up and the recruiter's and the overall organized interview process.
Give an example of someone you mentored and how it helped them in their career.
The following metrics were computed from 2 interview experiences for the Benchling Software Engineering Manager role in United States.
Benchling's interview process for their Software Engineering Manager roles in the United States is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very good feelings for Benchling's Software Engineering Manager interview process in United States.