Full remote work, pretty good work-life balance, and people are generally very collaborative.
There was poor leadership direction and a failure to take accountability for it.
Some core and core+1 members are really incompetent. Please hire better upper management.
The process was alright. I thought I did well on the coding question; however, I may have taken too long and was not able to move on in the process. They did not, however, offer any further explanation, so that is my assumption.
I had a very easy on-campus interview and was then invited to the final round. I then had three back-to-back pair programming interviews onsite. Some people were asked to have a fourth interview. What surprised me most was that there were no algor
The interview process was very streamlined. They do not use random algorithmic questions that you had to have seen before. Rather, they use more project-building questions to see how you think and approach problems. This method of interviewing is mu
The process was alright. I thought I did well on the coding question; however, I may have taken too long and was not able to move on in the process. They did not, however, offer any further explanation, so that is my assumption.
I had a very easy on-campus interview and was then invited to the final round. I then had three back-to-back pair programming interviews onsite. Some people were asked to have a fourth interview. What surprised me most was that there were no algor
The interview process was very streamlined. They do not use random algorithmic questions that you had to have seen before. Rather, they use more project-building questions to see how you think and approach problems. This method of interviewing is mu